Religious language has been theorized in multiple ways. I will look at how religious language has been theorized in the work of Jürgen Habermas and in the field of cognitive linguistics. I will compare these approaches to religious language and assess the results. In doing so, I will indirectly assess the confluence of these two theoretical approaches. My conclusion is that even with the similarities between these theoretical frames, religion is thematized differently under each method. Jürgen Habermas’s definition of religion as the output of ritual praxis is not compatible with the normative place of religious language found in cognitive linguistics.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:MANITOBA/oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/24048 |
| Date | 16 September 2014 |
| Creators | Derkson, Kyle |
| Contributors | MacKendrick, Kenneth (Religion) Janzen, Terry (Linguistics), Lewis, Justin (Religion) Axelrod, Charles (Sociology) |
| Source Sets | University of Manitoba Canada |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0643 seconds