Orientador: Mario Tanomaro Filho / Banca: Idomeo Bonetti Filho / Banca: Joni Augusto Cirelli / Banca: Marco Antonio Húngaro Duarte / Banca: Loise Pedrosa Salles / Resumo: Cimentos de silicato decálciosão estudados como materiais reparadores. O estudo foi divido em 4 capítulos: No primeiro, citotoxicidade (MTT e Apoptose), genotoxicidade (teste Cometa) foram avaliadas em Saos-2 para os materiais: Cimentos de silicato de cálcio puro (CSC); Modificado (CSCM); Resinoso (CSCR1, CSCR2 e CSCR3). Na viabilidade, CSC e CSCR3 (50mg/mL) foram citotóxicos. CSCR1, CSCR2 e CSCR3 mostraram maior apoptose. Somente CSC e CSCR2 não foram genotóxicos em 10mg/mL (P<0.05). No cap.2, CSCM e CSCR2, foram associados a radiopacificadores: óxido de zircônio e óxido de nióbio (micro e nano), óxido de bismuto, tungstato de cálcio. MTA foi o controle para citotoxicidade e bioatividade. Todos foram viáveis e apresentaram apoptose semelhantes (1:8). A necrose foi superior (P<0.05). Ambos CSCs induziram fosfatase alcalina (ALP) e ARS. No cap.3, Biodentine (Septodont), MTA Plus (Avalon), CSCRs Nb2O5 e ZrO2 foram analisados quanto à cito e genotoxicidade. No MTT (1, 3 e 7d), todos foram similares. No qPCR, houve expressão de BAX (3d.) para CSCRs, MTAP e CSCR ZrO2 (5d). Para BCL2, (3 e 5d) somente MTAP e CSCR Nb2O5 (5d.). Na genotoxicidade, todos (1:2 e 1:8) permaneceram similares (P<0.05). Cap. 4, os mesmos foram avaliados na bioatividade: MTT, proliferação celular, ALP (1, 3 e 7d), qPCR (alp e ocn), e ARS. Todos os grupos foram viáveis e induziram ALP, ARS e expressão gênica, destacando os materiais CSCR Nb2O5 e Biodentine. Desta forma, os materiais apresentam potencial biológico para ser usado na endodontia. Estudos adicionais devem ser realizados, especialmente para os materiais experimentais. / Abstract: Calcium silicate-based cements are studied as reparative materials. This study was divided into 4 chapters: In the first, cytotoxicity (MTT and apoptosis) and genotoxicity (Comet assay) were evaluated in Saos-2 for: Pure calcium silicatebased (CSC); Modified (CSCM); resin-based (CSCR1, CSCR2, CSCR3). In the Viability assay, CSC and CSCR3 (50mg/mL) showed lower cell viability. CSCR1, CSCR2, CSCR3 showed more apoptosis. Only CSC and CSCR2 were not genotoxity in 10mg/mL (P<0.05). Chapter 2, CSCM and CSCR2 were associated with radiopacifiers: zirconium oxide and niobium oxide (micro and nano), bismuth oxide and calcium tungstate. MTA was used for the control of cytotoxicity and bioactivity tests. All were viable and showed similar apoptosis (1:8). Necrosis was superior (P<0.05). CSCM and CSCR induced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ARS. Chapter 3, was compared Biodentine (Septodont), MTA Plus (Avalon), CSCRs ZrO2 and Nb2O5, on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. In MTT (1, 3 and 7 days) all were similar. In the qPCR, BAX was expressed by CSCRs (3d). MTAP and CSCR ZrO2 expressed in 5 days. For BCL2 gene (3 and 5d) only MTAP and CSCR Nb2O5 (5d). In genotoxixity assay, all (1:2 and 1:8) were similar (P<0.05). Chapter 4, we evaluated the same materials in Saos2 bioactivity: MTT, cell proliferation, ALP (1, 3 and 7d), qPCR (alp and ocn) and ARS. All groups were viable and induced ALP, ARS and gene expression, particularly CSCR Nb2O5 and Biodentine. Therefore, the biological materials has the potential to be used in endodontics. Additional studies should be conducted, especially for experimental cements. Additional studies should be conducted, especially for experimental cements. / Doutor
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UNESP/oai:www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br:UEP01-000874521 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Cornélio, Ana Lívia Gomes. |
| Contributors | Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" Faculdade de Odontologia (Campus de Araraquara). |
| Publisher | Araraquara, |
| Source Sets | Universidade Estadual Paulista |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | Portuguese |
| Type | text |
| Format | 99 f. |
| Relation | Sistema requerido: Adobe Acrobat Reader |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds