Knowing how to correctly count, is fundamental to the future mathematics success of young children. Earlier studies show that many South African primary school students underperform in mathematics even when evaluated with task below grade level. Reports suggest that this is a problem stemming from the poor pedagogic, and or content knowledge of classroom mathematics teachers. Shulman (1986; 1987) refers to this area of knowledge as Pedagogic Content Knowledge (PCK). In the field of mathematics teaching and learning, Ball, Thames and Phelps (2008) refer to it as Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching (MKfT). Teachers' mathematics PCK, comprises of three core knowledge domain: (i) Teacher's Knowledge of Content and Teaching (KCT); (ii) Teacher's Knowledge of Content and Student (KCS); and (iii) teacher's Knowledge of Content and Curriculum (KCC). Teachers' KCS was considered in this study as it concerns what teachers know about what learners know and how they learn. The general interest of this project was to study the construction of experience of mathematics (non-core domain knowledge) by genetic endowment on the basis of contextual data. More specifically, the particular interest of the study is on the construction of the experience of counting in the pedagogic situations of Grade 3 schooling. For that purpose, video records of mathematics teaching in two schools situated in working-class communities were analysed. The study adopted an Integrated Causal Model approach which drew on resources from different disciplines such as mathematics education, cognitive science, evolutionary psychology and mathematics. The study was partly framed by Bernstein's pedagogic device, particularly with respect to his notion of evaluation, as well as the inter-related constructs of PCK, MKfT and KCS. The theoretical resources used to describe computations were drawn largely from Davis (2001, 2010b, 2011a, 2012, 2013a, 2015, 2018) and related work on the use of morphisms as elaborated in Baker et al. (1971), Gallistel & King, (2010), Krause (1969) and Open University (1970). These resources were used to produce the analytic framework for the production of and analysis of data. The analysis describes the computational activities of teachers and learners during the recorded lessons, specifically the computational domains made available pedagogically. In so doing, I was able to provide more illumination on what is described as teacher's KCS for teaching counting at the Grade 3 level. From the generated data, the study finds that counting proper was restricted to the constitution and identification of very small ordered discrete aggregates which can be handled by human core domain object tracking system and approximate number system, and that an implicit reliance on numerical order derived from computations on aggregates was central to the teaching and learning of counting.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uct/oai:localhost:11427/36138 |
| Date | 11 March 2022 |
| Creators | Nwaoha-Peterside, Fortune |
| Contributors | Davis, Zain |
| Publisher | Faculty of Humanities, School of Education |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master Thesis, Masters, MEd |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds