Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ElisBGC_DISSERT.pdf: 1965027 bytes, checksum: 8ba2574da3e9ca0673c27e5e731c450a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-02-26 / This work aims to identify, describe and analyze the main mechanisms of reference present in the texts produced by students that are finishing their fundamental school. With this in mind, we observe 46 Portuguese classes. The class was in its 9th Fundamental level, in a public school of the Cruzeta, RN. In this period, we collected our corpus that is composed by the papers that students produced. This research has an ethnographic approach and it has as
theoretical support some studies about some mechanisms of reference, specifically, the lexical repetition and anaphor. In general, we are based on the studies about cohesive mechanisms from authors as Adam (2008); Beaugrande and Dressler (1981, 1997); Koch (1999, 2004, 2005, 2008), Marcuschi (1983, 1992, 2005, 2006); Bessa Neto (1991) and Neves (2006). In the corpus, we could identify some lexical repetitions (literal, with estrutural variation), as well as, anaphors, mainly pronominal ones. Then, we can notice that most students have showed difficulties in the use of those mechanisms of reference as a strategy of textual progression / Este trabalho tem por objetivo identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar os mecanismos de referencia??o mais recorrentes nas produ??es de texto dos alunos concluintes do Ensino Fundamental. Para tanto, acompanhamos 46 aulas de L?ngua Portuguesa, em uma turma de 9? ano do Ensino Fundamental de uma escola estadual situada na cidade de Cruzeta, RN. Nesse
per?odo, coletamos as reda??es que constituem o nosso corpus. A pesquisa segue uma abordagem etnogr?fica e teve como suporte te?rico estudos realizados sobre os mecanismos de referencia??o, em especial, a repeti??o lexical e a an?fora. De forma geral, fundamentamonos
em estudos sobre os mecanismos coesivos a partir de autores como Adam (2008), Beaugrande e Dressler (1981, 1997), Koch (1999, 2004, 2005, 2008), Marcuschi (1983, 1992, 2005, 2006), Bessa Neto (1991) e Neves (2006). No corpus, foram identificadas ocorr?ncias
de repeti??es lexicais (literal, com varia??o e estrutural), assim como an?foras, sendo mais frequentes as pronominais. Nesse sentido, constatamos que a maioria dos alunos apresenta dificuldades em utilizar esses mecanismos de referencia??o como estrat?gia de progress?o textual
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/16174 |
| Date | 26 February 2010 |
| Creators | Costa, Elis Bet?nia Guedes da |
| Contributors | CPF:44405243468, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4783941Y9, Galv?o, Marise Adriana Mamede, CPF:07443846487, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1829337364208280, Souza, Gilton Sampaio de, CPF:72084499453, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4708077H5, Rodrigues, Maria das Gra?as Soares |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos da Linguagem, UFRN, BR, Lingu?stica Aplicada; Literatura Comparada |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds