Background. The randomized controlled clinical trial is currently the most scientific method for evaluating the effect of medical interventions. The sample size of a trial is crucial for reliably estimating the effect. However, many clinical trials may not be sufficiently large in size to detect the effect of interventions assessed. Previous studies of the statistical power, a relative measure of the largeness of a study, were normally small, mainly examined trials with a statistically insignificant result and were flawed because of the biased or purely hypothetical estimate of the effect for the computation of the power. By using meta-analysis, we conducted this study with improved methods for estimating the power and included a larger number of trials. / Findings. A total of 2,923,912 patients from 2,872 clinical trials from 466 systematic reviews were included in the analyses of this thesis. Of the 466 systematic reviews, 24% (113) were identified from the five journals and the remaining 76% (353) were from the Cochrane Library. 1,000 trials and 1,583,204 patients were obtained from 113 systematic reviews identified in the journals, in which 13.7% (95% C.I.: 11.6%, 15.8%) of trials had a sufficient power and the overall power was 34.0% (95% C.I.: 33.7%, 34.3%). 1,872 trials and 1,340,708 patients were obtained from 353 systematic reviews identified in the Cochrane Library, in which 16.7% (95% C.I.: 15.0%, 18.4%) of trials had a sufficient power and the overall power was 37.8% (95% C.I.: 37.6%, 38.0%). (Abstract shortened by UMI.) / Methods. We identified trials from systematic reviews of clinical trials with binary outcomes published in five medical journals and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We analyzed the power of trials with a significant result as well as those with an insignificant result. In estimating the power, we used the combined odds ratio of the meta-analysis as the estimate of the effect for trials from systematic reviews with a statistically significant result and a relative risk reduction of 25% for trials from systematic reviews with a statistically insignificant result. In addition to use of the conventional method to estimate the power, we also developed a new "counting method" that does not need any assumption about the effect. Furthermore, the power is also expressed as a relative and absolute difference between the number of subjects required for a power of 80% and that actually recruited by the trials. / Tsoi Kam Fai. / "July 2005." / Adviser: Jin Ling Tang. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: B, page: 0161. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 107-113). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / School code: 1307.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_343627 |
| Date | January 2005 |
| Contributors | Tsoi, Kam Fai., Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of Medical Sciences. |
| Source Sets | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| Language | English, Chinese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, theses |
| Format | electronic resource, microform, microfiche, 1 online resource (xi, 131 p. : ill.) |
| Rights | Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds