ABSTRACT
As industries are upgrading rapidly from a lower steel grade to higher ones it has become necessary to study the effect of changing from lower steel grades to higher grades. This thesis reports on fatigue life and behaviour, economic implications and material composition of these higher strength steels (HSS) as compared to the conventional grades. Three grades are commercially available in South Africa: 300W, 350W and 460W. These different steel grades (conventional and HSS) with the same moment capacities where subjected to constant dynamic stresses and the fatigue crack growth of the overloading and unloading were monitored and compared with each other. The influences of the overloading and unloading made standard grades perform better under repeated loading than the HSS, since HSS have been proved to have poor ductility, resulting in lower number of cycles to failure. An 85% increase in material cost was generated as HSS replaces the conventional lower steel grades. Reduction in number of cycles to failure in HSS was over 500%.
A space analysis for a multi-storey building with 10 beam floors was conducted for the various steel grades using a software package. The buckling and linear behaviours of these structures were compared. Although the deflections were not too far apart, it was shown clearly that grade lower steel grades performed better than the higher grades.
An optimization was conducted using the parameters discussed in the text or obtained from experiment and computer modelling, in order to aid in the selection criterion of general purpose steel. Grade 300W was the optimal grade although the result was based mainly on the cost and fatigue behaviour of the three grades.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/4714 |
| Date | 28 March 2008 |
| Creators | Amobi, Ikechukwu Ugochukwu |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 55535 bytes, 280506 bytes, 49095 bytes, 129246 bytes, 527608 bytes, 517660 bytes, 385750 bytes, 100325 bytes, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0087 seconds