Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare principle Abstract This thesis deals with the concept and selected aspects of the nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare principle. This principle is one of the fundamental pillars of defence in criminal proceedings and is closely related to the right to a fair trial. The thesis focuses on the principle's theoretical starting points and attempts to outline problematic issues related to the interpretation of its content when applied in practice, particularly with regard to the permissible degree of coercion. The first chapter of the thesis deals with the historical development of the principle in both the continental and anglo-american legal systems. The second chapter contains an overview of how the principle is ensrished in international and national sources of law. The third chapter deals with the relationship between the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to remain silent based on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court. The fourth chapter is devoted to the evidence, in particular the procedural consequences of an infringement in the proceedings, focusing on lawful and unlawful methods of coercion and the individual defects resulting therefrom. The chapter also includes treatise on the doctrine of fruit from a poisoned tree, which...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:453291 |
| Date | January 2021 |
| Creators | Konečná, Zuzana |
| Contributors | Vokoun, Rudolf, Bohuslav, Lukáš |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds