Return to search

Facilitating shared understanding| A grounded theory for decision-making in pain management

<p> Inadequate and inconsistent nursing practices related to pain management are a significant problem facing stakeholders in the health care industry. The purpose of the research study was twofold: (a) to explore the processes used by registered nurses&rsquo; for clinical decision making regarding pain management in the acute care setting and (b) to develop a substantive theory using grounded theory by examining the emergent data from the perceptions of as many as 20 registered nurses. The study explored registered nurses&rsquo; perceptions of the process of clinical decision-making in pain management within the context of social norms of nursing care and the setting in which practice takes place. The exploration of the complex dynamics of clinical decision-making in pain management was guided by the principles of classic grounded theory. Fourteen registered nurses (<i>n</i>=14) participated in an interview process and provided their perceptions of the clinical decision-making process in pain management. Through an inductive iterative process of constant comparative analysis, patterns of conceptual relationships were revealed closing the theory-practice gap in the literature for the substantive problem of inadequate pain management and the process of clinical decision-making in pain management. The substantive theory that emerged from the data is facilitating shared understanding: registered nurses partnering through relating, referring, advocating, and bargaining with the patient, and members of the health care team to make patient-centered clinical decisions in pain management.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:10137454
Date15 September 2016
CreatorsRoss, Nancy J.
PublisherUniversity of Phoenix
Source SetsProQuest.com
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds