Return to search

A Comparative Study of Cellulose I and II and Fibers and Nanocrystals

The influence of sodium hydroxide treatment on the structure of cotton fibers was studied. Compared to raw cotton fibers, the entire bundles of mercerized fibers were converted into a swollen and roughened state. Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) indicated that intermolecular hydrogen bonding was enhanced by mercerization treatment. Wide-angle X ray diffraction (WXRD) results showed decreased fiber crystallinity after mercerization. The structure of cellulose II fibers was more thermally stable than cellulose I fibers. Mechanical properties of cotton fiber-reinforced polyethylene oxide (PEO) composites demonstrated that both raw and mercerized cotton fibers enhanced their tensile strength of the PEO matrix, but both made the composites more brittle due to poor fiber dispersion in the PEO matrix.
Cotton nano crystals (CNCs) were fabricated from both raw and mercerized cotton fibers by sulfuric acid hydrolysis combined with a high-pressure homogenization technique. Stable aqueous suspensions from both raw and mercerized CNCs were formed. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) suggested that there was no obvious change in crystal morphology from raw and mercerized cellulose. Dry mercerized crystals had a much larger bulk density than the dry raw crystals. FTIR and WXRD data showed a clear transition from cellulose I (raw) to II (mercerized) cellulose crystal structure. TGA curves showed that cellulose II CNCs had better thermal stability properties. The storage modulus of cellulose II CNC suspensions at all temperatures were obviously larger than those of cellulose I crystal suspensions at the same concentration level. Cellulose II CNC suspensions/gels were shown to be more thermally stable in response to temperature changes. Dilute cellulose II crystal suspensions formed an ordered liquid phase displaying chiral nematic orientation in the direction of the vector director at a much lower concentration level compared with cellulose I crystal suspension. Both cellulose I CNC /PEO and cellulose II CNC/PEO composites showed increased tensile strength and elongation at break compared with these of the pure PEO. However, composites with cellulose II crystals exhibited larger tensile strength, and elongation at break than those from composites with raw crystals due to the enhanced hydrogen bonding. Thus, cellulose II nano crystals provide better reinforcement materials for manufacturing advanced nano-composites.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-06062011-143639
Date08 June 2011
CreatorsYue, Yiying
ContributorsNegulescu, Ioan, de Hoop, Cornelis, French, Alfred D, Wu, Qinglin
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06062011-143639/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds