Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-06-06T18:06:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_FELIPE_SZYSZKA_KARASEK_COMPLETO.pdf: 1441847 bytes, checksum: b3a78df6bb528cb94266651a77cb66b1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-06T18:06:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_FELIPE_SZYSZKA_KARASEK_COMPLETO.pdf: 1441847 bytes, checksum: b3a78df6bb528cb94266651a77cb66b1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-21 / This doctoral dissertation addresses the analysis of the contemporary debate that puts forward the relation between Friedrich Nietzsche?s thought and philosophical naturalism. From this analysis, I argue that Nietzsche's thought cannot be related, prima facie, to any preconceived type of naturalist proposal. To achieve this goal, I analyze the following arguments: (i) the current debate about naturalism in Nietzsche tends to value a typology and wards off the meaning of philosophy proposed by him; (ii) it is not possible to relate Nietzsche's thought to any kind of preconceived concept of naturalism, though one can find naturalistic perspectives in his philosophy; (iii) Nietzsche can only be considered a naturalistic philosopher insofar as his philosophy is to represent a new approach away from the naturalistic categories that can be found in contemporary philosophy; (iv) his naturalistic perspectives are related to a notion of nature remote from the concept of nature proposed by contemporary naturalism; (v) the problem of morality in Nietzsche is related to his project of a transvaluation of values which is upheld by his notion of nature; (vi) the problem of morality in Nietzsche intends to seize the tragic element in its constitution. / O objetivo deste estudo ? analisar o debate contempor?neo que prop?e a rela??o do pensamento de Friedrich Nietzsche com o naturalismo filos?fico. A partir dessa an?lise, procuro demonstrar que o pensamento de Nietzsche n?o pode ser relacionado com nenhum tipo de proposta naturalista fechada. Para atingir esse objetivo, analiso os seguintes argumentos: (i) o debate atual a respeito do naturalismo em Nietzsche tende a valorizar uma tipologia e se afasta do significado de filosofia proposto por ele; (ii) n?o ? poss?vel relacionar o pensamento de Nietzsche a um tipo de naturalismo fechado, mas ? poss?vel encontrar perspectivas naturalistas em sua filosofia; (iii) Nietzsche s? pode ser considerado um fil?sofo naturalista se a sua filosofia representar um novo tipo de abordagem, diferente das categorias naturalistas que existem na filosofia contempor?nea; (iv) suas perspectivas naturalistas est?o relacionadas com uma no??o de natureza distante do conceito de natureza proposto pelo naturalismo contempor?neo; (v) o problema da moral em Nietzsche est? conectado com o seu projeto de transvalora??o dos valores, o qual est? sustentado pela sua no??o de natureza; (vi) o problema da moral em Nietzsche pretende apreender o elemento tr?gico em sua constitui??o.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6752 |
| Date | 21 March 2016 |
| Creators | Karasek, Felipe Szyszka |
| Contributors | Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hilario Fernandes de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 600, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds