Return to search

Acoustic Characterization of the Cellulose-coated Perfluorocarbon Droplets based on Phase Velocity Measurements / Akustisk karakterisering av cellulosa-belagda perfluorokarbon droppar baserat på våghastighet

Today, microbubbles are one of the most commonly used ultrasound contrast agents, since their high compressibility results in a strongly scattered signal. Despite this advantage, microbubbles experience limitations by the decreased stability and large diameter. The cellulose nanofiber (CNF) stabilized perfluoropentane (PFC5) droplets have the possibility of eliminating these drawbacks. In order to examine the droplet behavior and scattering ability when exposed to ultrasound, the acoustic response of the droplets is studied and compared with that of microbubbles (MBs). Therefore, this thesis aims to design an experimental set-up and a processing method to determine the phase velocity, bulk modulus and compressibility of the CNF-coated PFC5 droplets. The experimental study of the acoustic characterization uses pulse-echo spectroscopy with an aluminum reflector and seven flat transducers covering the frequency range 0.7 to 14.1 MHz. By using fast Fourier transform, while accounting for the 2πn ambiguity, the phase velocity profiles are obtained. The dispersions within this frequency spectrum are 1391-1487 m/s and 1387-1488 m/s for the concentrations 10 ∙ 106 and 50 ∙ 106 droplets/ml, respectively. These profiles display an increasing phase velocity with frequency and a slight increase in dispersion with concentration. These results agree with theory and studies examining the phase velocity of MBs. The bulk modulus presents values between 3-4 GPa, while the compressibility is 2.7 − 3.2 ∙ 10-10 𝑃𝑎-1 within the frequency range studied. Compared to water and certain MBs, both possessing a lower bulk modulus, the droplets are less compressible. To conclude, the droplets have similar phase velocity profiles with the same dependencies on frequency and concentration as MBs, resulting in similar behavior of these droplets when exposed to ultrasound. Hence, affecting the wave similarly to MBs in terms of spreading. The droplet are, however, not as compressible. This most likely affects their oscillation and they, hence, might not have equally beneficial scattering ability. This could reduce their utilization as contrast agents. Some of the potential error sources present during the laboratory work and the development of the post-processing code were not achieving perfect optimization of the transducer alignment, vaporization of the droplets resulting in reduced concentration, possible diffraction, not optimal processing of data and inadequate correction for 2πn ambiguity.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kth-276837
Date January 2020
CreatorsLindroth, Emma
PublisherKTH, Skolan för kemi, bioteknologi och hälsa (CBH)
Source SetsDiVA Archive at Upsalla University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeStudent thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text
Formatapplication/pdf
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
RelationTRITA-CBH-GRU ; 2020:101

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds