Studies have shown that facial sexual dimorphism, ranging on a continuum from very feminine to very masculine, affects observers’ ratings of dominance and threat. These studies, however, have used forced-choice paradigms, in which a pair of faces that have been manipulated to appear more masculine (masculinized) and feminine (feminized) are presented side by side. They are susceptible to demand characteristics, situational aspects of the experiment which produce the desired outcome, because participants may be able to draw the conclusion that faces which appear more masculine should be rated as more dominant. In this dissertation, I evaluated whether facial sexual dimorphism affects observers' threat perceptions in a way that minimizes the confounds caused by demand characteristics. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, I presented observers with masculinized and feminized faces individually, rather than in pairs, and for an extremely brief duration (Experiment 1). I predicted that observers would assign higher dominance (Experiment 1) and threat ratings (Experiment 2) to masculinized faces. Observers assigned higher dominance (Experiment 1) and threat (Experiment 2) ratings to masculinized faces, even when they were presented individually, and for as little as 100 milliseconds (ms) (Experiment 1). This would suggest that they can appraise differences in facial sexual dimorphism following very brief exposure. I proceeded to evaluate the effects of facial sexual dimorphism on men’s selective attention, while reducing the effects of demand characteristics, by testing for an attentional bias towards task-irrelevant masculinized men’s faces. In Experiment 3, forty-five men completed a Posner Cueing Paradigm in which they classified shapes, presented either right or left of center screen after a masculinized or feminized man’s face was presented in either the same or opposite location. Participants were faster to classify the shape following the presentation of a masculine face; however, they were not faster when a masculine face cued target position. In Experiment 4, forty-four men completed a Flanker Task in which they judged letter orientation (i.e., upright or upside-down), while ignoring flanking faces. Participants’ RT was not affected by Morph Type (i.e., whether the face was masculinized, feminized or unmodified). In Experiment 5, forty-one men completed a Dot Probe Task. They were presented with two facial photographs of different Morph Types to the left and right of center screen. This was followed by the presentation of a target shape, in the location of one of the faces. Participants’ objective was to classify shape orientation. Facial sexual dimorphism did not affect participants' classification speed. In Experiment 6, I primed participants with images meant to induce fear or arousal before each trial of a Dot Probe Task. Following the presentation of a fear inducing picture, participants RT to classify shapes when a masculinized face cued target position did not differ from when a feminized face cued target position. The two different presentation times did not create different patterns of results, indicating that masculinized faces did not induce either a cueing or inhibitory affect. Overall, my results do not support my hypothesis that men selectively attend to masculinized faces when they are presented as irrelevant information. I conclude by discussing future directions for evaluating the effects that facial sexual dimorphism has on observers’ interpersonal perceptions of threat and dominance, while controlling for the effects of demand characteristics.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/47508 |
| Date | 10 November 2023 |
| Creators | Albert, Graham |
| Contributors | Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R. |
| Source Sets | Boston University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds