DNA damage occurs to all living things; its subsequent repair is a crucial component of life. The most dangerous, and potentially most useful form of DNA damage is the double strand break (DSB). A DSB is defined by breaks occurring to both sugar phosphate backbones in close enough proximity that they lead to the separation of the two pieces of the DNA. This type of damage will kill the cell if left unrepaired. It is the most lethal type of DNA damage.
Most living organisms have also developed ways to take advantage of DSBs through their repair systems, primarily as a means of introducing genetic variation. There are two primary DSB repair pathways across life: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). The focus of this work is NHEJ. NHEJ is known as “error-prone” because it does not use a homologous template and can introduce small addition or deletion mutations during the repair process. This pathway has been extensively studied in eukaryotes and is known as the primary form of DSB repair in mammalian cells, however the prokaryotic NHEJ system was more recently identified and as a result, a void of information surrounds it.
NHEJ is comprised of 3 core steps: DSB recognition and binding, DNA end processing, and ligation. In the eukaryotic version of NHEJ these 3 steps involve a plethora of factors; conversely, in the prokaryotic version, the same functionality is accomplished by just 2 proteins, bacterial Ku and LigD. The focus of this research is Ku: the DNA end-binding protein responsible for identifying the DSB, binding and protecting the DNA end, as well as recruiting LigD to the break. Ku is composed of 2 domains, the first of which is predicted to be highly homologous to eukaryotic Ku’s equivalent domain; this is the core domain which forms a ring-like structure that DNA threads through. The second is completely unique to bacterial Ku, it is the C-terminal domain, which can further be split into 2 sub-domains, the minimal C-terminus, and the extended C-terminus. The sub-domains are defined by their level of conservation across bacterial species, with the minimal C-terminus being highly conserved, while the extended C-terminus is highly variable. Using DNA-binding assays and several mutant constructs which affect the C-terminal domain, I show that this C-terminus is unexpectedly responsible for destabilizing the Ku-DNA interaction. This observation leads me to hypothesize that maintaining a weak interaction with DNA is important for Ku because of the other proteins which need access to the DNA (e.g. replicative helicase). While Ku is bound, it could be capable of blocking regions of DNA, in turn blocking other vital cellular processes like replication. Ku maintaining a lower affinity for DNA should facilitate Ku displacement by other proteins. A tighter binding would restrict Ku’s freedom to move on DNA making it more likely to inhibit other critical pathways. To better understand Ku, I attempted to solve the Ku structure using X-ray crystallography, and was able to achieve crystals of Ku, however diffraction was too limited for a structure. Another way to investigate the validity of my proposed model is to use a biophysical approach with atomic force microscopy (AFM) to visualize protein-DNA complexes. The initial work has established key controls for future Ku-DNA AFM work by imaging and analyzing Ku on its own. Interest in bacterial NHEJ is two-fold from the antimicrobial perspective: NHEJ is a highly mutagenic pathway, so it serves as a proverbial well for differentiation and thus the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR); NHEJ is very important in bacteria that enter a stationary phase due to their lack of a homologous piece of DNA for HR. Thus, NHEJ inhibition could be useful for slowing bacterial evolution and potentially as a treatment for infections such a Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is known to lie dormant in host macrophages for long periods of time. To investigate the viability of NHEJ inhibition, I had begun the process of creating ∆ku strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to simulate Ku inhibition under various conditions. This Ku project is the focus of the first two chapters, however, during my Master’s degree I participated in 2 other major projects. The third chapter details a bacterial DNA damage tolerance pathway, which similarly is highly mutagenic and poorly characterized: the ImuABC translesion synthesis polymerase complex. The fourth and final chapter details the work for a Journal of Visualized Experiments article meant to highlight the benefits of AFM as a means of studying protein-DNA interactions. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/25572 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Koechlin, Lucas |
| Contributors | Andres, Sara, Biochemistry |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds