Return to search

The effects of carbon on nitrogen transformations in restored wetland and wastewater soils

Since the industrialization of the Haber-Bosch process in the 1940s, anthropogenic activity has nearly doubled the Earths nitrogen fixation. Furthermore, nitrate has become the number one groundwater contaminant in the United States and has harmful effects such as eutrophication, algal blooms, and pollution of drinking water. Soils from two sites influenced by high nitrate loading were examined to determine their biogeochemical integrity. First, the Loosahatchie Bar, located northwest of Memphis, Tennessee, is influenced by excess surface water nitrate loading by the Mississippi River. The Loosahatchie Bar is a newly restored wetland that now has similar hydrologic influence to an upstream control site. The upstream control site and the restored bar sites are both bottomland hardwood forest but exhibit very dissimilar soil properties and microbial functions. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the control and restored sites were observed for moisture content, bulk density, total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, microbial biomass nitrogen, potentially mineralizable nitrogen, and potential denitrification. Second, the Tallahassee Wastewater Treatment Plant, located just southeast of Tallahassee, Florida, receives high nitrate loads to spray field pivot soils from Tallahassee, Floridas municipal wastewater. Although the intended function of the spray field pivots is to remove excess nitrate from the wastewater, there has been observed eutrophication in Wakulla Springs 17.5 km south of the treatment facility. Soil analysis was conduced to compare the pivot soils with an up gradient control site. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed for moisture content, percent organic matter, total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and denitrifying enzyme activity. Carbon amendment experiments were conducted on the pivot soils with residual biosolids and corn plants. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) observed for potential denitrification with either carbon amendment. More research should be done to understand water retention at these sites and the microbial communities involved in denitrification.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-07062012-122105
Date12 July 2012
CreatorsTheriot, Jared M
ContributorsWhite, John R., DeLaune, Ronald D., Bargu, Sibel Ates, Chauhan, Ashvini
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07062012-122105/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.1612 seconds