Self neglect among older people refers to situations in which older individuals fail to adequately maintain their environment and to perform essential self care tasks. This concept has been variably addressed in the fields of biomedicine, adult protection, and suicide prevention, yet minimal research has been conducted on this topic in Australia. While the existing literature acknowledges that these situations can pose considerable challenges for professionals, no research has explored the actual experience of these dilemmas in professional practice. This thesis aims to address these gaps by critically exploring how self neglect among older people is understood in the Australian context, investigating the content of ethical dilemmas that arise in these situations, and examining how professionals resolve these ethical dilemmas. A two-part, qualitative methodology was used to address the research aims. In Part One, a five-month period of participant observation was conducted at a community-based organisation that had obtained funding to provide case management to people living in squalor. In Part Two, 18 semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals who worked with situations of squalor and self neglect in the community. The results from both parts of the research were analysed using NVivo, a software program specifically designed to assist in the analysis of qualitative data. This research uncovered that, unlike the definition of self neglect used in the wider literature on this topic, participants clearly differentiated between personal neglect (self neglect) and environmental neglect (squalor and hoarding). Ethical dilemmas were common in these situations and fully understanding how professionals resolved these dilemmas required that both objective and relational approaches to ethics be used to analyse participant responses. In this way, a pluralistic approach to ethics emerged as the theory best suited to fully explore ethical decision-making in situations where older people were self neglecting or living in squalor. Decisions that resulted in good outcomes were found to be increasingly constrained by changes to services driven by neoliberalism and managerialism. Individual reflection and peer support emerged as important elements that helped professionals to cope with the ethical dilemmas and the practical constraints that were encountered in these situations.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/257483 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | McDermott, Shannon Cumming, School of Social Science & International Studies, UNSW |
| Source Sets | Australiasian Digital Theses Program |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Rights | http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/copyright, http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/copyright |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds