Most studies that have examined parties that challenge the political establishment
have focused their attention on certain types of 'anti-political-establishment parties' (a-pe
parties), such as left-libertarian parties or right-wing populist parties. It is argued here
that before moving on to an exploration of the reasons behind the electoral success or
failure of specific a-p-e parties, one should take a closer look at the preconditions for the
success of a-p-e parties in general. This makes it necessary to avoid any 'time-specific'
or 'ideology-specific' explanations. Consequently, only those explanatory variables that
could be tested at any point in time and for any a-p-e party regardless of its position on
the left-right political scale were included in this study. Six hypotheses that fulfilled these
criteria were selected to be tested using data from nineteen advanced industrial
democracies covering the entire 1945 to 1999 time period. These hypotheses stress the
importance of the electoral system, political traditions, the economic conditions of a
country, the colluding behaviour of the establishment parties, certain party system
features and the 'availability' of voters.
In contrast to prior research which has often emphasized the importance of socioeconomic
and institutional factors, the results of the bivariate and multivariate analyses
suggest that political variables explain much of the variance in the level of electoral
support for a-p-e parties in different democracies, at different points in time. Thus, the
economic situation of a country as well as the electoral system do not appear to have a
significant impact on the electoral fortunes of a-p-e parties. On the other hand, anti- political-establishment parties thrive in an environment where and when the
establishment parties are fairly close to each other ideologically and where and when
weak partisan attachments make voters available to their appeals. In addition, the
behaviour of the establishment parties, especially the mode of interaction between them
and the main opposition is very important. That is, a-p-e parties profit from collusion
between the main establishment parties, especially in an environment that is characterized
by mutual distrust between the governing party(ies) and an opposition that is excluded
and sometimes even ostracized. / Arts, Faculty of / Political Science, Department of / Graduate
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/12797 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Abedi-Djourabtchi, Amir-Hassan |
| Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
| Format | 14619380 bytes, application/pdf |
| Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
Page generated in 0.0112 seconds