Return to search

An "Obvious" Proposal -- Using An Industry-Sensitive Doctrine of Obviousness to Govern the Scope of Gene Patents After Association For Molecular Pathology v. USPTO.

Currently there are approximately 20,000 valid gene patents in the United States. The debate regarding biotechnology and patent law has reached a pinnacle over the patentability of genes. Biotech is fighting a patentability war on two fronts. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cannot agree regarding the touchstone of patentability for genes; two branches of the Executive are at odds over whether gene sequences qualify under 35 U.S.C. §101. Recent U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit jurisprudence also undermine the patentability of genes as obvious. This thesis argues that the patentable subject matter debate fails to adequately address the goals of patent policy in fostering innovation. Looking to Canadian and U.K. jurisprudence, it is possible to hone an approach to obviousness that addresses the ethical and research concerns in the patentable subject matter debate while fostering investment and patent protection for non-obvious biotech discoveries.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/U000MR76530
CreatorsEngle, Sarah Noelle.
PublisherUniversity of Toronto (Canada).
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds