ABSTRACT
The number of people in immediate need of anti-retroviral treatment (ART) in the southern
African region continues to significantly exceed the capacity of health systems to provide it.
Approaches to this complex rationing dilemma have evolved in different directions. The ethical
concepts of fairness and equity have been suggested as a basis guiding rationing or patient
selection processes for ART. The purpose of the study was to examine whether or not such
concepts had relevance or operative value for a treatment team providing ART in rural Lesotho.
Using an exploratory, single case study design the study found that while concepts of fairness
and equity were relevant to the work of the treatment team, patient selection practices did not
necessarily reflect what these concepts entail. The idea of fairness as a structured, formalized
selection process did not figure in the approach to ART provision at St. Charles. A less formal,
‘first-come-first-served’ approach was adopted. While there was knowledge amongst some team
members that social, economic or geographic conditions inhibit individuals and groups from
gaining access to ART and that this was inequitable, it was felt that there was little they could do
to try to mediate the impact of these conditions. The study findings pose importance questions
about the approach to ART programming in resource constrained settings. The findings also
question the relevance of trying to achieve fairness and equity when the gap between need for
care and capacity to provide it remains so large.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/6915 |
| Date | 30 April 2009 |
| Creators | Armstrong, Russell |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0068 seconds