Return to search

Conceptualising and measuring health literacy from the patient perspective

The current patient-centred healthcare approach encourages individuals to assume greater roles in decisions about their health. The premise is that patients who are well informed about healthcare options are more likely to adhere to prescribed treatments and achieve better health outcomes. This approach assumes that patients have an adequate level of health literacy. While a range of definitions exist, health literacy is commonly defined as an individual’s ability to seek, understand and utilise health information to make appropriate health decisions. / Health literacy is increasingly recognised as a complex multi-dimensional concept which involves interactions between individual abilities and broader environmental factors. However across definitions, there has been little consultation with patients to understand what is important to effectively seek, understand and utilise health information. The lack of a consensual understanding has led to debate as to what health literacy represents and how it should be measured. A range of measures exist with the predominant approach being the testing of individual literacy abilities. However measures do not assess the range of attributes described in definitions. Thus a considerable gap exists between how health literacy is defined and how it is measured. This thesis focused on addressing this gap. The objectives were to: (i) critically appraise existing health literacy measures (ii) develop a conceptual framework from the patient perspective and (iii) use this framework to develop a comprehensive measure of health literacy. / A multi-method qualitative and quantitative approach was used: / (1) Systematic review and appraisal of the content, development and psychometric properties of health literacy measures. / (2) In-depth consultations with patients across healthcare and disease continuums to develop a conceptual framework. / (3) Development of a new health literacy measure based on the conceptual framework using a classical test theory approach. / A critical appraisal of the literature revealed that the majority of health literacy measures are not based on a conceptual framework and none appeared to adequately measure a person’s ability to seek, understand and utilise health information. Content focussed primarily on reading, comprehension and numeracy skills and scoring was poorly defined. Only five of the 19 measures had evidence of acceptable reliability. / The conceptual framework of health literacy from the patient perspective identified 17 key elements: six individual abilities and 11 broader contextual factors that are important to seek, understand and utilise health information and expanded previous conceptualisations of health literacy. This informed the development of the Health Literacy Management Scale (HeLMS) which measures six generic and potentially modifiable abilities and three specific broader social factors. Overall the HeLMS measures an individual’s ability to seek, understand and utilise health information within the healthcare setting. The HeLMS consists of 29 items across eight domains. Rigorous psychometric testing demonstrates that it possesses strong construct validity and high reliability (coefficient α >0.80 for all eight domains). / This research provides unique contributions to the conceptualisation and measurement of health literacy. Limitations in the content and psychometric properties of previously developed measures have been identified through a systematic process. A conceptual framework derived from the patient perspective identifies a range of components that provide new insight into: (i) constructs that should be incorporated to measure health literacy and (ii) areas that need to be addressed to improve health literacy. The development of the HeLMS now allows for a more comprehensive assessment of health literacy. Information from the conceptual framework and the HeLMS are likely to be useful tools to inform the development of public health initiatives to enhance patient participation in the management of their health.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/269931
Date January 2009
CreatorsJordan, Joanne Emma
Source SetsAustraliasian Digital Theses Program
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
RightsRestricted Access: Abstract and Citation Only Available

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds