Return to search

Testing a Self-Determination Theory Model of Recovery from Problematic Alcohol Use Through Peer-Support Attendance

Over the last century, peer-support programs have emerged as viable treatment options for
individuals in recovery from problematic alcohol use (White, 2009). During this time,
researchers have generated a considerable amount of evidence suggesting that peer-support
programs promote widespread benefits among group members (e.g., White, 2009). Despite a
growing body of research in this area, little is currently known about the processes explaining
how peer-support groups help people achieve positive recovery outcomes. The current study
adopts a self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) framework to explore the means by
which peer-support programs promote well-being, group satisfaction, and sustainable behaviour
regulation for limiting alcohol use. Eighty-one peer-support attendees responded to a brief web-survey about self-regulation, well-being, and peer-support group experiences. These participants were recruited as part of a larger longitudinal project (entitled “Sober Together”) on peer-support for problematic alcohol use. Preliminary findings indicated that peer-support attendees who perceived group environments as need supportive were more likely to experience psychological need fulfillment, and in turn, greater well-being, group satisfaction, and autonomous regulation for limiting alcohol use. Notably, participants who perceived a congruent “spiritual-fit” with
secular or spiritually-based peer-support programs also appeared more likely to experience their group as need supportive, which in turn, bolstered perceptions of psychological need fulfillment.
Findings highlight the importance of structuring peer-support environments in a manner that
supports psychological needs. / Graduate / 0621 / 0622 / 0451 / tcarey@uvic.ca

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:uvic.ca/oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/4881
Date30 August 2013
CreatorsCarey, Tyler M.
ContributorsGrouzet, Frederick M. E.
Source SetsUniversity of Victoria
LanguageEnglish, English
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
RightsAvailable to the World Wide Web

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds