Return to search

An?lise t?cnico-econ?mica de m?todos de inje??o de microemuls?o na recupera??o avan?ada de petr?leo

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-01-23T14:27:43Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TamyrisThaiseCostaDeSouza_TESE.pdf: 2326336 bytes, checksum: d59b4b1968aa5a394e4f90ffa36135cc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-01-25T11:49:52Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
TamyrisThaiseCostaDeSouza_TESE.pdf: 2326336 bytes, checksum: d59b4b1968aa5a394e4f90ffa36135cc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-25T11:49:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TamyrisThaiseCostaDeSouza_TESE.pdf: 2326336 bytes, checksum: d59b4b1968aa5a394e4f90ffa36135cc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-10-11 / M?todos de recupera??o avan?ada de petr?leo s?o utilizados com o objetivo de aumentar a produtividade de reservat?rios nos quais, os m?todos convencionais s?o pouco eficientes, ou mesmo como alternativa inicial para produ??o. Dentre esses m?todos, existem os m?todos t?rmicos, misc?veis e qu?micos. A utiliza??o dos m?todos qu?micos de recupera??o avan?ada atua na altera??o de propriedades f?sico-qu?mica rocha/fluido, diminuindo a satura??o residual de ?leo e aumentando o deslocamento de ?leo no meio poroso. A inje??o de fluidos qu?micos, como solu??o de pol?mero, solu??o de tensoativo e microemuls?o, busca aumentar a viscosidade de fluido injetado, diminuir a tens?o interfacial e aumentar a miscibilidade entre o fluido injetado e o ?leo retido. Estudos nessa ?rea mostram que fluidos qu?micos s?o considerados uma alternativa eficaz na produ??o de petr?leo ap?s a utiliza??o de ?gua ou g?s como fluido de inje??o. Neste trabalho foi avaliado a utiliza??o de fluidos qu?micos (solu??o de tensoativo e microemuls?o) na recupera??o avan?ada de petr?leo (EOR) com a Ultramina NP200 como tensoativo. Os sistemas microemulsionados foram compostos por: Ultramina NP200; n-Butanol; querosene e ?gua de abastecimento local. Os sistemas microemulsionados (SM) foram caracterizados por medidas de di?metro de part?cula, tens?o superficial, tens?o interfacial e viscosidade. Nos testes de EOR, avaliou-se a influ?ncia da concentra??o de tensoativo injetado e a forma como a tens?o superficial, interfacial e a viscosidade influenciam na recupera??o de ?leo cru (29? API). A utiliza??o de solu??o de Ultramina NP200 conseguiu aumentar a capacidade de deslocamento de petr?leo em rela??o a inje??o de salmoura. Por?m, a solu??o de tensoativo, apesar da alta concentra??o (25% m/m), obteve fator de recupera??o inferior quando comparado a microemuls?o, mesmo quando a concentra??o de mat?ria ativa ? baixa (1,0% - m/m). O fator de recupera??o aumentou com o aumento da concentra??o de tensoativo na microemuls?o, por?m esse crescimento foi significativo para a inje??o de SM com at? 6% (m/m) de tensoativo. Observou-se tamb?m que ? poss?vel alcan?ar resultados satisfat?rios de recupera??o injetando menores quantidades microemuls?o, seguida de inje??o de salmoura. A utiliza??o do sistema microemulsionado com 6% tensoativo (SM4) com vaz?o de 0,5 mL/min, chegou a recupera??o do ?leo in place de 24,1% (%OOIPA) e recupera??o total de 77,2% (%OOIPT). Na avalia??o econ?mica, foi observado que a utiliza??o de pequenos volumes de microemuls?o, com maior concentra??o de tensoativo, pode resultar em um projeto mais vi?vel, mediante an?lise do pre?o do barril de petr?leo. No cen?rio atual (50 USD/bbl) ? poss?vel alcan?ar uma taxa interna de retorno (TIR) de 27% por inje??o e 0,5Vp de SM3 e 2,5Vp de salmoura. / Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are used to increase the productivity of reservoirs when water or gas injections are inefficient, or can be used as a initial alternative to production. EOR methods is classified in thermal, miscible and chemical. The use of chemical methods acts on the alteration of physicochemical rock / fluid properties, reducing the residual oil saturation and increasing the displacement of oil in the porous medium. Injection of chemical fluids, such as polymer solution, surfactant solution and microemulsion, seeks to increase the viscosity of injected fluid, decrease interfacial tension and increase miscibility between the injected fluid and the retained oil. Studies in this area show that chemical fluids are efficient alternative in the production of oil after the use of water or gas as an injection fluid. In this work the use of chemical fluids (surfactant and microemulsion solution) in the EOR with Ultramina NP200 as a surfactant was evaluated. Microemulsion systems are composed of: Ultramina NP200; n-Butanol; kerosene and local water supply. Microemulsion systems (SM) were characterized by measurements of droplet size, surface tension, interfacial tension and viscosity. In the EOR tests, the influence of the injected surfactant concentration and the way in which surface tension, interfacial and viscosity influence the recovery of crude oil (29? API) was evaluated. The use of Ultramina NP200 solution has been able to increase the capacity of displacement of petroleum in relation to the injection of brine. However, the surfactant solution, despite the high concentration (25% m / m), obtained a lower oil recovery when compared to the microemulsion, even when the active matter concentration is low (1.0% - m / m). The oil recovery increased with increasing surfactant concentration in the microemulsion, but this growth was significant for SM injection with up to 6% (m / m) of surfactant. It has also been observed that satisfactory results of %OOIPA can be achieved by injecting smaller amounts of microemulsion followed by injection of brine. The use of the microemulsified system with 6% surfactant (SM4) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL / min, reached the oil recovery in place of 24.1% (% OOIPA) and total recovery of 77.2% (% OOIPT). In the economic evaluation it was observed that the use of small volumes of microemulsion, with higher concentration of surfactant, can result in a more viable project, by analyzing the price of a barrel of oil.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24659
Date11 October 2017
CreatorsSouza, Tamyris Thaise Costa de
Contributors07286937391, Gurgel, Antonio Robson, 03510725433, Rodrigues, Marcos Allyson Felipe, 04575614408, Vale, Tulio Yterbio Fernandes, 85050822491, Santanna, Vanessa Cristina, 77938780430, Dantas Neto, Afonso Avelino, Dantas, Tereza Neuma de Castro
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ENGENHARIA QU?MICA, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.002 seconds