Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-09-24T12:10:01Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
Bergamini, Leonardo Lima.pdf: 1174414 bytes, checksum: 8ab040a0c96a503f2c2dab35be6be5ea (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-09-24T15:37:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2
Bergamini, Leonardo Lima.pdf: 1174414 bytes, checksum: 8ab040a0c96a503f2c2dab35be6be5ea (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-09-24T15:37:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Bergamini, Leonardo Lima.pdf: 1174414 bytes, checksum: 8ab040a0c96a503f2c2dab35be6be5ea (MD5)
license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-06-02 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / The process of host-plant selection is the main interface in the herbivore-plant
interactions, with deep consequences for the ecology and evolution of those groups. In
this work, we investigate some steps of the host-plant selection in two congeneric
species of seed beetles. In the first chapter, we assess the oviposition pattern and larval
survival in the seed-beetle G. cavillator to evaluate whether oviposition site choices
maximize offspring survival, accounting for the spatially hierarchic structure of the
system. In the second chapter, we analyze the fine-scale positioning of G. speculifer
eggs, and explore the role of geometric constraints in the egg distribution patterns.
Altogether our results exemplify how small differences in key traits of the host-plant
selection can lead to significant differences in the interaction between herbivore insects
and their host plants. / O processo de seleção de plantas hospedeiras é a principal interface nas
interações herbívoro-planta, com profundas consequências para a ecologia e evolução
destes grupos. Neste trabalho investigamos algumas etapas da seleção de hospedeiras
em duas espécies co-genéricas de besouros bruquíneos. No primeiro capítulo avaliamos
o padrão de oviposição e de sobrevivência das larvas de G. cavillatorpara testar se as
escolhas das fêmeas estão de acordo com as expectativas da teoria de oviposição ótima,
considerando a estrutura espacialmente hierárquica do sistema. No segundo capítulo
analisamos a seleção em fina-escala da posição dos ovos nas vagens pelas fêmeas de G.
speculifer, e exploramos o papel da restrição geométrica da vagem em definir o padrão
de distribuição dos ovos. Tomados em conjunto, os resultados dos dois capítulos
exemplificam como pequenas diferenças em atributos-chave do processo de seleção de
hospedeiras podem levar a importantes diferenças na interação entre insetos herbívoros
e suas plantas hospedeiras.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/3154 |
Date | 02 June 2013 |
Creators | Bergamini, Leonardo Lima |
Contributors | Almeida-Neto, Mário |
Publisher | Universidade Federal de Goiás, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução (ICB), UFG, Brasil, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - ICB (RG) |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFG, instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás, instacron:UFG |
Rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/, info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Relation | -5361682850774351271, 600, 600, 600, 600, -3872772117827373404, 8720082068366305046, 2075167498588264571, Bernays, E. & Graham, M. (1988). On the Evolution of Host Specificity in Phytophagous. Ecology, 69, 886–892. Farrell, B.D. (1998). “Inordinate Fondness” Explained: Why Are There So Many Beetles? Science, 281, 555–559. Gaston, K.J. (1991). The Magnitude of Global Insect Species Richness. Conservation Biology, 5. 55 Gripenberg, S., Mayhew, P.J., Parnell, M. & Roslin, T. (2010). A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecology letters, 13, 383–93. Jaenike, J. (1978). On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 350–356. Jaenike, J. (1990). Host Specialization in Phytophagous Insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 243–273. Janz, N. & Nylin, S. (2008). The Oscillation Hypothesis of Host-Plant Range and Speciation. In: Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: the Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects (ed. Tilmon, K.J.). University of California Press, Berkeley, California, pp. 203–215. Johnson, C.D., Romero, J. & Romero-Nápoles, J. (2004). A review of evolution of oviposition guilds in the Bruchidae ( Coleoptera ). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 48, 401–408. Kato, T., Bonet, A., Yoshitake, H., Romero-Nápoles, J., Jinbo, U., Ito, M., et al. (2010). Evolution of host utilization patterns in the seed beetle genus Mimosestes Bridwell (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 55, 816–32. Manfio, D., Ribeiro-costa, C.S. & Caron, E. (2012). Phylogeny and revision of the New World bruchine genus Gibbobruchus Pic, 1913 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Invertebrate Systematics, Accepted. Mayhew, P.J. (1997). Adaptive Patterns of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Oikos, 79, 417. Mayhew, P.J. (2001). Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends in ecology & evolution (Personal edition), 16, 165–167. Mayhew, P.J. (2007). Why are there so many insect species? Perspectives from fossils and phylogenies. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 82, 425–54. Mitter, C., Farrell, B. & Wiegmann, B. (1988). The Phylogenetic Study of Adaptive Zones : Has Phytophagy Promoted Insect Diversification ? American Naturalist, 132, 107–128. Nosil, P. & Ecology, B. (2002). Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution, 56, 1701–1706. Nyman, T. (2010). To speciate , or not to speciate ? Resource heterogeneity , the subjectivity of similarity , and the macroevolutionary consequences of niche-width shifts in plant-feeding insects. Biological Reviews, 85, 393–411. 56 Scotland R.W. & Wortley A.H. (2003). How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon, 52, 101–104. Ødegaard, F. (2000). How many species of arthropods? Erwin’s estimate revised. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 71, 583–597. |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds