<p>Static analysis on source code or binary code retrieves information about a software program. In object-oriented languages, static points-to analysis retrieves information about objects and how they refer to each other. The result of the points-to analysis is traditionally used to perform optimizations in compilers, such as static resolution of polymorphic calls, and dead-code elimination. More advanced optimizations have been suggested specifically for Java, such as synchronization removal and stack-allocation of objects. Recently, software engineering tools using points-to analysis have appeared aiming to help the developer to understand and to debug software. Altogether, there is a great variety of tools that use or could use points-to analysis, both from academia and from industry.</p><p>We aim to construct a framework that supports the development of new and the improvement of existing clients to points-to analysis result. We present two client analyses and investigate the similarities and differences they have. The client analyses are the escape analysis and the side-effects analysis. The similarities refer to data structures and basic algorithms that both depend on. The differences are found in the way the two analyses use the data structures and the basic algorithms. In order to reuse these in a framework, a specification language is needed to reflect the differences. The client analyses are implemented, with shared data-structures and basic algorithms, but do not use a separate specification language.</p><p>The framework is evaluated against three goal criteria, development speed, analysis precision, and analysis speed. The development speed is ranked as most important, and the two latter are considered equally important. Thereafter we present related work and discuss it with respect to the goal criteria.</p><p>The evaluation of the framework is done in two separate experiments. The first experiment evaluates development speed and shows that the framework enables higher development speed compared to not using the framework. The second experiment evaluates the precision and the speed of the analyses and it shows that the different precisions in the points-to analysis are reflected in the precisions of the client analyses. It also shows that there is a trade-off between analysis precision and analysis speed to consider when choosing analysis precision.</p><p>Finally, we discuss four alternative ways to continue the research towards a doctoral thesis.</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:vxu-1687 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | Edvinsson, Marcus |
| Publisher | Växjö University, School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, Växjö : Matematiska och systemtekniska institutionen |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Licentiate thesis, monograph, text |
| Relation | Rapporter från MSI, 1650-2647 ; 07126 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds