Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ErikaKLP_DISSERT.pdf: 1821167 bytes, checksum: a5b7798f9445987f653dae43a51ab1b2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-03-21 / Family farming has been considered as the new axis of rural development in the
country, the focus of several public policies, especially the National Program for
Strengthening Family Agriculture - PRONAF and Food Purchase Program - PAA.
PRONAF was created with the aim of providing credit to farmers, while the PAA to
support family farmers through the purchase of its production. In this context, the
objective of this study is to analyze the correspondence of these two public policies for
family farming, in the Territories of Citizenship of the state of Rio Grande do Norte,
between the years 2008 to 2010. In the methodology, the analysis was performed by
comparing the distributions of the two programs in the territories of citizenship status.
There were also statistical tests of differences in proportions, and Spearman
correlations, and estimated a logit regression model, in order to measure the probability
of a farmer participating in the PAA is associated with one of the modes of PRONAF.
The data used were obtained from the National and Supply - CONAB at the Institute of
Technical Assistance and Rural Extension - EMATER, and the Ministry of Agrarian
Development - MDA. Among the key findings was noted that policies were associated
with a direct, but low in the districts of the Territories of Citizenship. And that, in the
years 2008 and 2009, only in the territories of Mato Grande, Alto Oeste and Serid?, the
actions of PAA and PRONAF had direct and significant correlations. It was found that
in most of the territories, policies are performed randomly, ie that both have no
correlation to each other. The estimates of the logit model showed that the chance of a
family farmer, the PAA participant, receive credits PRONAF A, is higher in the
territory of Mato Grande, and would have a chance to fall in PRONAF B in all areas
surveyed. Moreover, farmers in the territories of the Assu-Mossor?, Sert?o of Apodi,
Serid? and Alto Oeste, participating in the PAA would be more likely to receive credits
PRONAF C, reflecting thus the family farm more consolidated these territories / A agricultura familiar tem sido considerada como o novo eixo de desenvolvimento rural do pa?s, sendo foco de diversas pol?ticas p?blicas, com destaque para o Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar - PRONAF e o Programa de Aquisi??o de Alimentos - PAA. O PRONAF foi criado com o intuito de oferecer
cr?dito para os agricultores familiares, enquanto o PAA apoiar o agricultor familiar mediante a compra da sua produ??o. Neste contexto, o objetivo geral deste estudo ? analisar a correspond?ncia destas duas pol?ticas p?blicas, para agricultura familiar, nos Territ?rios da Cidadania do estado do Rio Grande Norte, entre os anos de 2008 a 2010.
Na metodologia, a an?lise foi realizada comparando-se as distribui??es dos dois programas nos territ?rios da cidadania do estado. Realizaram-se, ainda, testes estat?sticos de diferen?as de propor??es, e de correla??es de Spearman e, estimado, um
modelo de regress?o logit, com a finalidade de mensurar a probabilidade de um
agricultor participante do PAA est? associado a uma das modalidades do PRONAF. Os dados utilizados foram obtidos na Companhia Nacional e Abastecimento - CONAB, no Instituto de Assist?ncia T?cnica e Extens?o Rural EMATER, e no Minist?rio do Desenvolvimento Agr?rio - MDA. Entre os principais resultados notou-se, que as pol?ticas apresentaram uma associada direta, por?m baixa nos munic?pios dos
Territ?rios da Cidadania. E, que, nos anos de 2008 e 2009, somente nos territ?rios do Mato Grande, Alto Oeste e Serid?, as a??es do PAA e do PRONAF apresentaram correla??es diretas e significativas. Verificou-se, que na maior parte dos Territ?rios, as pol?ticas s?o executadas de forma aleat?ria, ou seja, que ambas n?o possuem
correspond?ncia entre si. As estima??es do modelo logit mostraram que a chance de um agricultor familiar, participante do PAA, receber cr?ditos do PRONAF A, ? mais elevada no territ?rio do Mato Grande, e que teria uma menor chance de se enquadrar no PRONAF B em todos os territ?rios pesquisados. Al?m disso, os agricultores familiares
dos territ?rios do Assu-Mossor?, Sert?o do Apodi, Serid? e Alto Oeste, que participam do PAA, teriam mais chances de receberem cr?ditos do PRONAF C, refletindo-se, assim, a agricultura familiar mais consolidada destes territ?rios
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/14080 |
| Date | 21 March 2012 |
| Creators | Paula, Erica Karla Lucena de |
| Contributors | CPF:19281897415, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784214T6, Matos Filho, Jo?o, CPF:05001650410, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0252534020824779, Vital, Tales Wanderley, CPF:02125153491, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7205781562225613, Silva, Jorge Luiz Mariano da |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Economia, UFRN, BR, Economia Regional |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0114 seconds