Return to search

INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PRIVATE GIVING TO PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS

INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PRIVATE GIVING TO PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES:
A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS
YING LIU
In recent years, increasing market competitiveness and rising educational costs have underscored the importance of external revenues in higher education finance. Even as the higher education costs continue to exceed the rate of inflation, public funding from both state and federal sources is steadily declining. As traditional funding sources become less reliable, colleges and universities seek to pursue alternative revenues such as private donations.
Using panel data of public colleges and universities from 1994-2003, this study investigated how institutional characteristics and environmental factors influence overall private giving and its varying sources to public colleges and universities. Hausman test was used to test two competing specifications --- fixed-effects model and random-effects model, and fixed effects model was identified as more appropriate to this study.
The results of the study verified that both institutional characteristics and environmental factors have some effects on private giving an institution receives. The following institutional characteristics were statistically significant: alumni/ae of record, expenditure per FTE, total revenue per FTE, endowment per FTE. The following environmental factors were statistically significant: state appropriation per FTE, state tax appropriation for higher education per $1000 of state personal income, state financial aid per student, citizen ideology, and gross state product per capita.
This study suggested a general conceptual framework to better understand forces that influence total private giving as well as private giving from different donor groups. Findings of this study have some practical implications to higher education policymakers and practitioners. Institutions at the top of the institutional hierarchy enjoy accumulative advantage in generating private giving. That is, donors are more willing to support institutions with higher quality, more endowment, and more state appropriations. Additionally, increase in state support to higher education does not displace private giving to public colleges and universities. Finally, environmental factors also play important roles in successful fund raising in public colleges and universities.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03282007-175455
Date17 April 2007
CreatorsLiu, Ying
ContributorsKaren E. Campbell, Will Doyle, James C Hearn, Michael K. McLendon
PublisherVANDERBILT
Source SetsVanderbilt University Theses
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03282007-175455/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0012 seconds