Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / In this study, Janis Edwards and Carol Winkler’s method, based on Michael McGee’s ideograph, is applied to non-discursive forms in order to understand the extent to which these images can be understood as a representative form functioning ideographically. Artifacts for analysis include the 2008 Shepard Fairey Obama “PROGRESS” and “HOPE” images, related campaign graphics, and parodies, political and non-political, humorous and serious. Literature on visual rhetoric, the ideograph, and extensions of McGee’s ideograph to visual forms was reviewed. When the method was applied to the artifacts, the Obama “HOPE” image was found to be an example of a representative form. Additionally, the representative form was demonstrated to function ideographically in the parodied examples analyzed in this thesis. Opportunities for further study on the visual ideograph and additional artifacts were proposed.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IUPUI/oai:scholarworks.iupui.edu:1805/3884 |
Date | 29 January 2014 |
Creators | Terrell-Curtis, Kara Beth |
Contributors | Sheeler, Kristina Horn, 1965-, Karnick, Kristine Brunovska, 1958-, Dobris, Catherine A. |
Source Sets | Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis |
Language | en_US |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds