Return to search

The Role of Polyploidy in Phenotypic and Genomic Evolution in the Shy Monkeyflower, <i>Mimulus sookensis<i>

<p>In an ever-changing world, evolution is an essential process that may allow organisms to adapt to their environment through natural selection. All evolutionary processes act through a single fundamental medium: genetic variation. Polyploidy, or whole genome duplication, is a major mechanism for evolutionary change because it is both widespread across taxa and results in a proliferation of genetic material that evolution can act upon. The key questions addressed here are: (1) How does chromosome pairing during meiosis in allopolyploids affect the magnitude of genetic variation?, (2) How does the genome of polyploids evolve following formation, and what genetic mechanisms govern this evolution?, and (3) How does genetic and genomic evolution in polyploids affect phenotypic evolution? I use the shy monkeyflower, <italic>Mimulus sookensis</italic>, a tetraploid of hybrid origin between <italic>Mimulus guttatus</italic> and <italic>Mimulus nasutus</italic>, to address these focal questions. In order to develop a foundation to aid in interpretation of my findings, I first investigate the evolutionary history of <italic>M. sookensis</italic>. Chromosome counts establish that <italic>M. sookensis</italic> is indeed an allotetraploid, and a review of taxonomic literature reveals that this species is heretofore undescribed. By analysing the patterns of genetic variation at chloroplast and nuclear loci in <italic>M. guttatus</italic>, <italic>M. nasutus</italic>, and <italic>M. sookensis</italic>, I show that <italic>M. sookensis</italic> has recurrently formed from <italic>M. guttatus</italic> and <italic>M. nasutus</italic>. Crossing experiments within <italic>M. sookensis</italic> indicate that recurrent origins can contribute to genetic diversity without contributing to reproductive isolation among independently arisen polyploid lineages.</p><p>To address my focal questions, I take advantage of an intriguing and striking difference in flower size among <italic>M. sookensis</italic>, <italic>M. guttatus</italic>, and <italic>M. nasutus</italic>. The flowers of <italic>M. sookensis</italic> and <italic>M. nasutus</italic> are small and remarkably similar to one another, while the flowers of <italic>M. guttatus</italic> and diploid and tetraploid F1 hybrids between <italic>M. guttatus</italic> and <italic>M. nasutus</italic> are large and showy. This phenotypic divergence in flower size between <italic>M. sookensis</italic> and <italic>M. guttatus</italic>-like hybrids indicates that small flower size has evolved in <italic>M. sookensis</italic>. Using genetic marker data and phenotypic measurements from synthetic neoallotetraploid <italic>Mimulus</italic>, I demonstrate that there are low levels of fragment loss and phenotypic variation in neoallotetraploids; this suggests that homeologous pairing and recombination following polyploidization is not a major source of genetic variation or phenotypic evolution in <italic>M. sookensis</italic>. Analysis of the whole genome sequence of two <italic>M. sookensis</italic> lines reveals that <italic>M. sookensis</italic> is a fixed heterozygote throughout its entire genome, in that it has retained both a <italic>M. guttatus</italic>-like and <italic>M. nasutus</italic>-like subgenome, neither of which have been removed through homeologous recombination. These subgenomes have been homogenized by widespread gene conversion, and do not appear to have been differentially affected by deletions or deleterious mutations. Finally, to directly characterize the genetic architecture of flower size in <italic>M. sookensis</italic>, I cross a large-flowered synthetic neoallotetraploid <italic>Mimulus</italic> to small-flowered <italic>M. sookensis</italic>. I then employ a novel genotyping-by-sequencing approach to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with flower size. I find that there is one locus that accounts for a large proportion of phenotypic variation, and four other loci also contribute to flower size variation between the parental lines. Some of these loci co-localize with previously identified loci for flower size in diploid <italic>Mimulus</italic>, while others do not. Altogether, genetic marker data, phenotypic analysis of neoallotetraploids, whole genome sequence data, and QTL mapping data suggest that the genetic variation necessary for flower size evolution was likely caused by both gene conversion and new mutations, but not homeologous recombination. These results suggest that trait evolution in polyploids may be affected by the unique attributes of polyploids, but that new mutations are always an important source of genetic variation, regardless of ploidy level.</p> / Dissertation

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:DUKE/oai:dukespace.lib.duke.edu:10161/6178
Date January 2012
CreatorsModliszewski, Jennifer Louise
ContributorsWillis, John H
Source SetsDuke University
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeDissertation

Page generated in 0.065 seconds