Total institutions' (which include prisons) unique context
prescribes "confinement" of inmates. Coping mechanisms applied
"outside" (especially the ability to create distance from
stressful events) is thus ineffective.
Another common feature is lack of privacy, which may result
in "forced intimacy" - individuals being forced into a situation
of physical and psychological "invasion" (beyond the norm) of
their person/personal space. Victims lose control over intimate
decisions, including who may and may not be intimate with them.
Within prisons, gangs "force intimacy" by sexually
victimizing inmates, taking advantage of the context to heighten
their power, and to control inmates "under" them. Four
(subjects) victims' experiences and means of adaptation/
empowerment were investigated phenomenologically.
Results indicated that inadequately empowered victims
suffer prolonged and repeated victimization - a continued "posttraumatic
stress disorder" - which is more traumatizing and
draining than one circumscribed traumatic event (due to its
intensity, immobilization and resulting drastic change of
"personality"). / Psychology / M.A. (Clinical Psychology)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za:10500/15829 |
| Date | 11 1900 |
| Creators | Prince, Craig |
| Contributors | Snyders, Frederik Jacobus Albertus, 1946- |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | 1 online resource (xv, 183 leaves) |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds