During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, George H.W. Bush achieved
the rhetorical success that had escaped his prior speaking endeavors. If the
aforementioned assessments regarded Bush’s Gulf War rhetoric as a rhetorical triumph,
in light of prior damning criticism of his rhetorical abilities, then an explanation for that
triumph is in order. Bush’s rhetoric differed from his Presidential predecessors by virtue
of two factors. First, as the first U.S. president of the Post-Cold War era, Bush’s rhetoric
faced different rhetorical constraints than those faced by his predecessors, as he no
longer had the narrative framework of the Cold War to explain U.S. foreign policy
action. Second, Bush rhetorically juxtaposed American exceptionalism and realism
within his rhetoric itself. This differed from the rhetoric of his immediate predecessor,
Ronald Reagan, whose rhetoric employed American exceptionalism without reference to
realism, although that rhetoric was strategically geared toward achieving realist foreign
policy ends. Bush’s success was also considerable in that he faced significant rhetorical
constraints created or exacerbated by Reagan. Reagan’s reputation as the “Great Communicator,” contrasted with Bush’s less-than-stellar reputation as an orator, makes
Bush’s rhetorical success particularly worth understanding.
President George H.W. Bush relied on three particular arguments to facilitate a
U.S. military victory during the 1991 Persian Gulf War. These arguments differed
considerably from foreign policy arguments offered by the Reagan administration with
respect to the manner in which they addressed issues concerning the United Nations and
the Vietnam War. First, Bush promoted U.N. diplomacy as a subsidiary of U.S. foreign
policy. For Bush, the U.N. served as a venue where world opinion could be galvanized
and action serving United States interests would not be constrained so much as
legitimized. Second, he compared and contrasted U.S. action in the Gulf to the Vietnam
War. In doing so, he combined the moral urgency of prior foreign policy efforts with the
hindsight necessary to avoid a repeat of the American experience in Vietnam. Third, in
retrospectively assessing the Gulf War, Bush depicted the conflict as a discrete foreign
policy event in which he narrowly defined victory. Bush defined victory as the removal
of Iraqi forces from Kuwait, in an attempt to shape a historical consensus on the
significance of U.S. action.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1614 |
| Date | 15 May 2009 |
| Creators | Rangel, Nicolas , Jr. |
| Contributors | Dorsey, Leroy G. |
| Source Sets | Texas A and M University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Book, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text |
| Format | electronic, application/pdf, born digital |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds