This thesis is a case study applying George Lakoff’s theories regarding frames to a specific series of legislation dealing with immigration. First, literature is examined regarding changes in Congress and media and the relationship between the two. George Lakoff’s theories on framing are discussed, playing special attention to the familial models and biconceptualism. The case study regards immigration reform legislation that was attempted to pass through Congress in 2007, specifically the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 and the STRIVE Act. The application of Lakoff’s theories to this case study aids in further understanding the link between politics and communication and the importance of persuasion in a political setting. / Department of Political Science
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/193791 |
| Date | January 2009 |
| Creators | Kritzer, Kristopher M. |
| Contributors | Reagan, Daniel J. |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Format | 64 p. : digital, PDF file. |
| Source | CardinalScholar 1.0 |
| Coverage | n-us--- |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds