Return to search

Primary school teachers' conception of assessment in relation to the implementation of target oriented curriculum (TOC) framework.

by Cheung Wai-wan Vivian. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 131-137). / ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS --- p.ii / ABSTRACT --- p.iii / LIST OF TABLES --- p.vi i / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- INTRODUCTION / Chapter 1.1 --- Background and problem of the study --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Purpose of the study --- p.4 / Chapter 1.3 --- Significance of the study --- p.4 / Chapter 1.4 --- Definition of terms --- p.5 / Chapter CHAPTER 2 --- REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE / Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.9 / Chapter 2.2 --- The changing paradigms of assessment in the past decades --- p.10 / Psychometrics --- p.11 / Educational measurement --- p.12 / Chapter 2.3 --- The nature and purposes of assessment --- p.12 / Chapter 2.4 --- Assessment in relation to different learning models --- p.14 / Traditional models of learning --- p.14 / Cognitive and constructivist models of learning --- p.15 / Chapter 2.5 --- Major forms of educational assessment --- p.16 / Norm-referenced versus cri terion-referenced assessment --- p.16 / Formative versus summative assessment --- p.18 / Performance versus authentic assessment --- p.19 / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY / Chapter 3.1 --- The examination culture of Hong Kong --- p.21 / Chapter 3.2 --- The Target Oriented Curriculum (TOC) of Hong Kcng --- p.24 / Chapter 3.3 --- The Targe´tؤoriented Assessment (TOA) and its relation with learning and teaching --- p.26 / The Targe´tؤoriented Assessment (TOA) --- p.26 / Chapter 3.4 --- Role of teachers in Target-oriented Assessment --- p.29 / Chapter 3.5 --- Some possible factors affecting teachers' conceptions towards assessment within TOA --- p.31 / Chapter 3.6 --- Curriculum implementation and the factors affecting teachers' attitudes towards implementation --- p.32 / Chapter 3.7 --- Research on teachers' conceptions of assessment --- p.34 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- METHODOLOGY / Chapter 4.1 --- Research questions of the study --- p.37 / Chapter 4.2 --- Theoretical considerations of the choice of interview type and interview questions --- p.38 / On the choice of interview type --- p.38 / On the choice of interview questions --- p.39 / The ordering of interview questions --- p.41 / Considerations before and during interviews --- p.41 / Chapter 4.3 --- Subjects --- p.42 / The pilot study --- p.42 / The main study --- p.43 / Chapter 4.4 --- Procedures --- p.44 / The pi1ot study --- p.44 / The main study --- p.44 / Chapter 4.5 --- Data analysis --- p.45 / Chapter 4.6 --- Interview questions for the pilot study --- p.46 / Description of the interview questions --- p.47 / Chapter 4.7 --- The pilot study --- p.49 / The standardized open-ended interview --- p.49 / The use of controlled contexts in eliciting responses --- p.49 / The finalization of interview questions for the main study --- p.50 / Chapter 4.8 --- Interview questions for the main study --- p.51 / Chapter 4.9 --- Limitations --- p.52 / Chapter CHAPTER 5 --- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION / Chapter 5.1 --- "Teachers' perception of the purposes of educational assessment, and the relationships between teaching, learning and assessment" --- p.53 / On the purposes of educational assessment --- p.53 / On teachers' definition of educational assessment --- p.55 / On the relationships between assessment and teaching --- p.56 / On the relationships between assessment and learning --- p.58 / Sommary --- p.59 / Chapter 5.2 --- Analysis of teachers' conceptions of educational assessment --- p.59 / The focus of educational assessment --- p.59 / On the choice of assessment activities --- p.62 / Summative versus formative assessment --- p.64 / On the collection of learning evidence --- p.67 / On the reporting of assessment results --- p.69 / Summary --- p.71 / Chapter 5.3 --- Holistic categorization of teachers' conceptions towards assessment --- p.73 / The criterion-referenced-and-qualitative conception --- p.76 / The norm-referenced-and-quantitative conception --- p.77 / The pseudo-criterion-referenced-and- qualitative conception --- p.79 / Chapter 5.4 --- Self-reported factors affecting teachers' conceptions towards assessment --- p.83 / Chapter 5.5 --- Teachers' knowledge of the major forms of assessment --- p.86 / Chapter 5.6 --- Teachers' attitudes towards the implementation of TOC --- p.89 / On the necessity of implementing TOC --- p.89 / On the worthiness to implement TOC --- p.92 / On teachers' choice of the types of curriculum --- p.95 / Chapter 5.7 --- The relationship between teachers' conceptions of assessment and their views towards the implementation of TOC --- p.97 / Chapter CHAPTER 6 --- "CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS" / Chapter 6 1 --- Conclusions --- p.102 / Chapter 6.2 --- Implications --- p.107 / Chapter 6.3 --- Recommendations --- p.111 / Chapter 6.4 --- Future research --- p.113 / APPENDICES / Chapter A. --- Questionnaire on the personal particulars of TOC teachers participated in the study --- p.115 / Chapter B. --- Questionnaire on the personal particulars of non-TOC teachers participated in the study --- p.116 / Chapter C. --- Controlled contexts used in the interview --- p.117 / Chapter D. --- Characteristics of TOC and non-TOC teachers participated in the pilot study --- p.122 / Chapter E. --- Background information of TOC and non-TOC teachers participated in the main study --- p.123 / Chapter F. --- Profiles of conceptions of assessment of TOC and non-TOC teachers participated in the main study --- p.125 / REFERENCES --- p.131

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_321988
Date January 1997
ContributorsCheung, Wai-wan Vivian., Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of Education.
Source SetsThe Chinese University of Hong Kong
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, bibliography
Formatprint, ix, 137 leaves : ill. ; 30 cm.
CoverageChina, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong
RightsUse of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds