For many years, medical malpractice claims have threatened the effective governance of health care sectors the world over. South Africa is not exempt from the effects of this phenomenon. The effects of increasing medical malpractice claims and their associated costs threaten the effective governance of the private and public health care sectors, which results in a vicious cycle of resource depletion, poor service delivery and constantly increasing rates of medical malpractice incidents. This research aims to add to the body of work in South Africa concerning the adverse effects of medical malpractice claims. This dissertation provides a theoretical discussion on whether periodic payments and alternative dispute resolution are satisfactory responses to combat both the rising cost of damages and the procedural backlogs present within the law of delict and medical malpractice litigation in South Africa to achieve comprehensive reform in the law of delict. Ultimately, this dissertation examines the practical legal issues that have led to the current medical malpractice crisis in South Africa. The dissertation examines the role of aspirational health care policies, goals and agendas (specifically section 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa) that have been implemented on a national level, and it also examines the ability to implement comprehensive reform to address the medical malpractice crisis to hopefully break the vicious cycle that is keeping South Africa from achieving its national and constitutional health care goals.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uct/oai:localhost:11427/37830 |
| Date | 20 April 2023 |
| Creators | Sarfo-Adomah, Amma |
| Contributors | Price, Alistair |
| Publisher | Faculty of Law, Department of Public Law |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master Thesis, Masters, LLM |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0174 seconds