Return to search

Toward designing a sustainable watershed reclamation strategy

Oil sands mining results in significant disturbances to natural ecosystems when soil and overburden materials are removed and stockpiled to provide access to mined materials. The mining process must be followed by land reclamation, whereby disturbed landscapes are recovered with the intent to replicate the performance of natural watersheds. Modeling hydrological processes in reclaimed landscapes is essential to assess the hydrological performance of the reclamation strategies as well as their evolution over time, and requires a reliable and continuous source of input data. In pursuit of simulating the various hydrological processes, such as soil moisture and actual evapotranspiration, a lumped generic system dynamics watershed (GSDW) model has been developed. The validity of the proposed model has been assessed in terms of its capacity to reproduce the hydrological behaviour of both reconstructed and natural watersheds.<p>
Data availability is a major challenge that constrains not only the type of models used but also their predictive ability and accuracy. This study evaluates the utility of precipitation and temperature data from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) versus conventional platform data (e.g., meteorological station) for the hydrological modeling. Results indicate NARR data is a suitable alternative to local weather station data for simulating soil moisture patterns and evapotranspiration fluxes despite the high complexity involved in simulating such processes. Initially, the calibrated GSDW model was used along with available historical meteorological records, from both Environment Canada and NARR, to estimate the maximum soil moisture deficit and annual evapotranspiration fluxes. A probabilistic framework was adopted, and frequency curves of the maximum annual moisture deficit values were consequently constructed and used to assess the probability that various reconstructed and natural watersheds would provide the desired moisture demands. The study shows a tendency for the reconstructed watersheds to provide less moisture for evapotranspiration than natural systems. The probabilistic framework could be implemented to integrate information gained from mature natural watersheds (e.g., the natural system canopy) and transfer the results to newly reconstructed systems.<p>
Finally, this study provided some insight into the sensitivity of soil moisture patterns and evapotranspiration to possible changes in the projected precipitation and air temperature in the 21st century. Climate scenarios were generated using daily, statistically downscaled precipitation and air temperature outputs from global climate models (CGCM3), under A2 and B1 emission scenarios, to simulate the corresponding soil moisture and evapotranspiration using the GSDW model. Study results suggest a decrease in the maximum annual moisture deficit will occur due to the expected increase in annual precipitation and air temperature patterns, whereas actual evapotranspiration and runoff are more likely to increase.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:USASK/oai:usask.ca:etd-11012010-132524
Date03 November 2010
CreatorsKeshta, Nader
ContributorsSi, Bing, Valeo, Caterina, Barbour, Lee, Carey, Sean, Elshorbagy, Amin, Putz, Gordon
PublisherUniversity of Saskatchewan
Source SetsUniversity of Saskatchewan Library
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-11012010-132524/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds