Return to search

A Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analytic Methods

The individual functional analysis (FA) is the most widely used method to identify variables that influence the occurrence of problem behavior. Researchers often modify the FA after the analysis reveals undifferentiated responding. The interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) is one of the most substantial variations of the FA that builds upon the FA modifications. We evaluated the use of the two different functional analytic methods, the FA and IISCA, and the subsequent function-based treatment to reduce problem behavior for three children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The individual FA and the IISCA demonstrated differentiated responding for all participants. The treatment based on the results from the traditional FA was effective for all children. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc1157622
Date05 1900
CreatorsPerkins, Crysta
ContributorsToussaint, Karen, Smith, Richard, Zangrillo, Amanda
PublisherUniversity of North Texas
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formativ, 36 pages, Text
RightsPublic, Perkins, Crysta, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds