Wind power is one of the most promising renewable energy sources that has gained enormous attention, especially in the electricity generation sector over the past decade in the United States. In this study Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is implemented to quantitatively evaluate the relative efficiencies of the 236 large utility-scale wind farms. Input- and output-oriented CCR (Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes) and BCC (Banker, Charnes, and Cooper) models are applied to pre-determined three input and three output variables. The sensitivity analysis is conducted for the robustness of DEA by introducing seven new models with the various combinations of input and output variables of the original model. Tobit regression models are developed for the second stage of the analysis to investigate the effects of specifications of the wind turbine technologies. DEA results indicate that two-thirds of the wind farms are operated efficiently. On average, 70% of the wind farms have a considerable potential for further improvement in operational productivity by expanding these wind farm projects, 24% of them should reduce their operational size to increase their productivity level, and 6% of them are operating wind power at the most productive scale size. Nonparametric statistical tests show that the most efficient wind farms are located in Oklahoma because of the relatively high wind speed resources. Tobit regression model indicates the selection of the brand of the wind turbine has a significant contribution to the productive efficiency of the wind farms. The results of this study shed some light on the current efficiency assessments of the 236 large utility-scale wind farms in the United States and the future of wind energy for both energy practitioners and policy makers.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-11778 |
Date | 01 December 2017 |
Creators | Sağlam, Ümit |
Publisher | Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
Source Sets | East Tennessee State University |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Source | ETSU Faculty Works |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds