Return to search

The United Nations and humanitarian interventions: action vs. inaction in the contemporary practice (case study) / OSN a humanitárne intervencie v súčasnej praxi: činnosť vs. nečinnosť (prípadová štúdia)

The concept of humanitarian interventions has seen increased interest especially since the end of the Cold War. During the last two decades, humanitarian interventions have been at the centre of the emerging doctrine of the responsibility to protect. Through collecting and analysing the United Nations documents and historical experience, this thesis concludes that within contemporary representation of the humanitarian interventions, inaction is not a viable answer to mass violations of human rights. However, as the case of Darfur shows, this renewed commitment towards collective action has not been translated into actions yet. The practice of humanitarian interventions and the role of the United Nations need to be consolidated so that the inconsistency and selectivity objections are eradicated.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:191967
Date January 2013
CreatorsHlopková, Lucia
ContributorsZemanová, Štěpánka, Trávníčková, Zuzana
PublisherVysoká škola ekonomická v Praze
Source SetsCzech ETDs
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds