White wine clarity is essential, but it can be marred by the presence of a protein haze. This protein haze is predominantly formed by grape-derived thaumatin-like proteins and chitinases, which can slowly denature and aggregate if left in bottled wines. Currently bentonite fining is used by the wine industry to prevent protein haze. Bentonite consists of fine clay particles that, when added to wine, bind and remove the haze-forming proteins. However this method is inconvenient, time-consuming, and causes significant losses of wine. It is estimated that this process costs the Australian wine industry $50 m annually in wine losses alone. Alternatives are thus being investigated. The principal objective of this thesis was to investigate the sensory effects on wine of an alternative method to bentonite fining: addition of haze protective factor 2, known as Hpf2. Hpf2 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoprotein that has been shown to reduce protein haze in wines. It is a highly mannosylated 180 kDa protein, of which approximately 75% by weight is mannose. Previous work has shown that the addition of approximately 200 mg L⁻¹ Hpf2 to wines reduces the visible haze in wine by approximately 50%. Hpf2 is naturally present in wines at concentrations of less than 10 ng L⁻¹, much lower than the concentration required for haze protection activity. However, the sensory impacts involved with the addition of such high concentrations of Hpf2 in wine have never been studied. This knowledge is essential for the future commercial prospects of this alternative approach to protein stabilisation of wine. To undertake sensory studies, over 1 g of Hpf2 would be required. Presently, the laboratory-scale process for the production of a 6-histidine tagged version of the protein, 6xHisHpf2, in a laboratory yeast strain of S. cerevisiae, produces only milligram quantities. Consequently, the first challenge of this research was to scale up the existing process to produce sufficient quantities of Hpf2. The first attempt to increase the production level was by over-expression in the bacteria Escherichia coli. Although several approaches were trialled, 6xHisHpf2 was unable to be successfully and consistently expressed in this system. The second method was by improving the original yeast expression system, and the expression level was able to be improved approximately 10-fold. This improved expression method was scaled up to produce and then purify over 1 g of protein. Several quantification methods were assessed to determine the efficiencies of each purification step, with slot blot analysis proving successful. Sensory trials were conducted to establish the effect of 6xHisHpf2 on wines, with duo-trio studies conducted assessing both aroma and palate of the wines. Invertase, another yeast haze protective factor, was also trialled. It was found that the addition of an active level of 6xHisHpf2 or invertase did not cause a significant difference in the aroma or palate of wines. In addition to this main study, the role of the glycosylation was studied. 6xHisHpf2, produced in a different yeast, Pichia pastoris, was found to be 83 kDa, with only 50% mannose. This protein was compared to the S. cerevisiae protein in its ability to reduce protein haze, and it was shown that the P. pastoris protein could reduce haze, but not as effectively as the S. cerevisiae protein. The finding that Hpf2 does not affect the sensory properties of wine is essential if Hpf2 is to be used commercially, as winemakers and wine consumers would most likely reject an additive that alters the wine aroma or palate. This work has brought the wine industry a step closer to a new method for protein haze prevention in white wines. / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Chemical Engineering, 2008
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/282131 |
| Date | January 2008 |
| Creators | Macintyre, Oenone Jean |
| Source Sets | Australiasian Digital Theses Program |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds