Protein:protein interactions are central to the regulation of the intrinsic programmed cell death (apoptosis) pathway. Opposing members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, which have distinct sequence features, interact with each other on the outer mitochondrial membrane to regulate apoptosis. Pro-survival proteins such as Bcl-2, Bcl-x[L], Bcl-w, Mcl-1 and A1 protect cells from apoptosis and contain up to four regions of homology to Bcl-2 (Bcl-2 homology domains 1 - 4, BH1-4). Pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins such as Bim, Puma, Noxa, Bad, Bmf, and Bid promote apoptosis by interacting with and inactivating pro-survival proteins, and contain just the BH3-domain. The pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bak are essential for apoptosis and contain three regions of homology to Bcl-2 (the BH1-, BH2- and BH3-domains).
In this study, two different sets of interactions involving pro-survival proteins were investigated. Initially, the pro-apoptotic protein Bnip3 was examined to determine if it was a mitochondrial anchor for the pro-survival protein Bcl-w. Secondly, to characterise the interactions between a pro-survival protein and different BH3-domains, structures were solved of the pro-survival protein A1 in complex with four different BH3-domains.
In the structure of Bcl-w, the hydrophobic C-terminus is bound to its own BH3-domain binding groove. This location of the C-terminus is consistent with the observation that Bcl-w is only loosely associated with the outer mitochondrial membrane in healthy cells. Upon interaction of Bcl-w with a BH3-domain, Bcl-w becomes tightly associated with the mitochondrial membrane, presumably due to displacement of the C-terminal residues by the BH3-only protein. In healthy cells it has been suggested that Bcl-w is associated with the membrane due to an interaction with an unidentified membrane protein, which preliminary experiments suggested may be Bnip3. Protein interaction experiments performed in vitro and in vivo did not reveal an interaction between Bnip3 and Bcl-w.
It was originally thought that each pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein could interact with all pro-survival proteins. However, it has recently become clear that there is selectivity within the pathway suggesting functional groupings. Bim and Puma behave as originally predicted and can interact with all pro-survival proteins and are potent killers. In contrast, Noxa and Bad interact with distinct subsets of pro-survival proteins. Noxa only binds Mcl-1 and A1, while Bad binds Bcl-2, Bcl-x[L] and Bcl-w. As a result, either Noxa or Bad acting alone is a weak killer, but together they are potent. Other BH3-only proteins bind tightly to some pro-survival proteins and weakly to others.
The diversity that exists between BH3-domain sequences precludes sequence-based identification of the determinants of specificity. In this study, crystal structures of A1:Puma BH3-domain, A1:Bmf BH3-domain, A1:Bak BH3-domain and A1:Bid BH3-domain complexes have been solved. Differences identified between these structures explain some of the variation in affinities observed in pro-survival protein:BH3-domain complexes. These observations, in combination with published data, suggest that BH3-domains bind weakly when the optimal interactions with conserved residues cannot be formed. Additionally, differences were observed in the A1:Bak BH3-domain structure that may be functionally important for the regulation of Bak.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/217785 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | Smits, Callum, n/a |
| Publisher | University of Otago. Department of Biochemistry |
| Source Sets | Australiasian Digital Theses Program |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Rights | http://policy01.otago.ac.nz/policies/FMPro?-db=policies.fm&-format=viewpolicy.html&-lay=viewpolicy&-sortfield=Title&Type=Academic&-recid=33025&-find), Copyright Callum Smits |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds