<p> Clinical utility has been offered by numerous researchers as a criterion for understanding the value of diagnostic constructs, but it does not yet have a standard operational definition or recommended forms of measurement. The construct has significant overlap with diagnostic validity and it is possible that sub-domains of clinical utility may emerge that would contribute to development of a scale which could assess for improvements and degradations following nosological revisions, and also provide opportunity for cross-analysis with alternative systems of mental health diagnosis. Therefore, the present study collected survey data from psychologists about the clinical utility of the <i>DSM-5,</i> using online data collection and quantitative methods. Seven questions of clinical utility were rated using a 5 point likert scale for each of the <i>DSM-5</i>'s diagnostic categories and for the <i>DSM-5</i> as an overall nosology. Descriptive data, internal consistency and inter-item correlations were analyzed so that results could help address research questions posed about the clinical utility of the <i> DSM-5</i>'s diagnostic categories, the merits of <i>DSM-5</i> when compared to <i>DSM-IV,</i> and additional recommendations regarding optimal measurement of the clinical utility of diagnostic constructs.</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:10000347 |
| Date | 30 January 2016 |
| Creators | Nockels, Paul |
| Publisher | Northern Arizona University |
| Source Sets | ProQuest.com |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | thesis |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds