Return to search

CASE-BASED DISCUSSIONS in an EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY COURSE: PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESSES AND INTERACTIONS

The purpose of this study was to describe the interactions between a classroom facilitator and student teachers during whole class case-based discussions. Five questions were explored. 1) What role did the facilitator play in whole class discussions? 2) How did particular cases elicit problem solving? 3) What kinds of engagement did students demonstrate in each discussion? 4) How did individuals differ in their participation during case discussions? 5) How did turn-taking between students and facilitator, change over time?
The data sources were transcripts of videotaped whole-class case discussions and a semi-structured interview with the facilitator. This study analyzed, in detail, both the content of the case discussions in the framework of problem solving strategies and the interaction between the facilitator and the students during the seven whole-class discussions.
The content of the discussions was analyzed specifically looking at the aspects of problem solving, which regards problem analysis, solution analysis, knowledge resources and individualized perspectives. The interaction analyses were categorized as asking, probing, agreeing, challenging, clarifying, paraphrasing, praising, inviting, referring and elaborating. The results revealed that the facilitator was more often guiding and supporting student participation in the first three discussions. The facilitator orchestrated the discussion by sharing responsibilities for learning and teaching together. The content and the nature of the case influenced the format of the discussion. Students personal and professional experiences affected their engagement and contribution to the discussions. This study gives some insights into how whole-class discussion works and how the facilitator and students engage in these discussions. This study reveals that interaction and content of discussions could be affected not only by students background knowledge and previous experiences, but also by the facilitators intentions and purposes.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-12102007-163846
Date29 January 2008
CreatorsEren Artan, Ayten
ContributorsDr. Stephanie Valutis, Dr. Jere Gallagher, Dr. Carl N. Johnson, Dr. Karen K. Block
PublisherUniversity of Pittsburgh
Source SetsUniversity of Pittsburgh
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-12102007-163846/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0025 seconds