Return to search

Development of electrochemical sensing in nuclear pyroprocessing : a study of the cerium-aluminium binary system with macro- and microelectrodes

Future nuclear fission reactors (GEN IV) are designed to include fast breeder reactor technologies, which can accept transuranics (elements heavier than uranium) as fuel. This has the potential of being more fuel efficient but requires the closing of the nuclear fuel cycle: full recycling of existing and newly generated nuclear waste to extract uranium and transuranic elements which can be reused as fuel. In the UK a system being investigated is electrochemical pyroprocessing which uses molten LiCl-KCl eutectic (LKE), which aims to recover uranium by electrodeposition on an inert (steel) electrode and the transuranics by electrodeposition as alloys with an active metal electrode (bismuth, cadmium or aluminium). Of the three active metal candidates, aluminium has the best separation efficiency of actinides and lanthanides, which is important as lanthanides are neutron poisons and so are not to be extracted. The development of pyroprocessing requires fundamental understandings of electrochemical alloy formation, as well as on-line monitoring tools to ensure the reprocessing occurs safely and efficiently. To that end, this thesis investigates cerium-aluminium alloying (a non-radioactive model system for plutonium-aluminium) on macro- and microelectrodes to understand the limiting factors during the alloying reaction at each electrode scale and also the circumstances under which the Ce3+ concentration can be reliably determined for on-line monitoring. On a bulk aluminium macroelectrode one cerium-aluminium alloying reaction was observed. This reaction was kinetically limited by the phase change from cerium insertion into the aluminium, and resulted in lattice expansion and progressive roughening of the electrode surface. These factors made it difficult to reliably calculate the Ce3+ concentration. Li+ from the solution was also able to reduce and form alloys with aluminium, approximately 0.3 V more negative than the first cerium-aluminium alloying peak. Since lithium atoms are smaller than cerium, and there is an abundance of Li+ in the salt, lithium-aluminium alloy was found to form preferentially to cerium-aluminium alloy at these more negative potentials. By co-depositing Al3+ and Ce3+ together on a tungsten electrode which is inert under these conditions (it does not alloy), the kinetic barrier to alloy formation by cerium insertion was decreased, which is beneficial to studying the thermodynamics of alloying. Studies of pure aluminium plating and pure cerium plating showed each individual reaction was diffusion limited, with an increased contribution of convection to the mass transport at slow scan rates. Co-deposition on macroelectrodes with a low ratio of [CeCl3]:[AlCl3] showed only one cerium-aluminium alloying peak. The co-deposition currents, and ratio of oxidation peaks charges, showed that co-deposition was occurring with both species under diffusion control, resulting in an amorphous alloy with a Ce:Al ratio that smoothly varied with the [CeCl3]:[AlCl3] ratio. This was in contrast to the alloying behaviour of cerium with liquid bismuth, in which co-deposition occurred at specific ratios determined by the crystal phases that could be formed at the applied potentials, with higher co-deposition ratios being achieved at more negative potentials. Co-deposition on macroelectrodes with a high ratio of [CeCl 3]:[AlCl3] could result in up to five cerium-aluminium alloy peaks, corresponding to all five CexAly crystalline phases predicted by the phase diagram. This phase change from amorphous to crystalline was promoted by the high Ce:Al ratio in the amorphous alloy resulting from the high [CeCl3]:[AlCl3] ratio and by plating pure cerium on the surface, which could then insert into the alloy. Charge analysis of these peaks confirmed the expected stoichiometries of the crystal phase from these in-situ measurements which is important for rapid analysis, whereas all previous literature has relied on ex-situ techniques which cooled the alloy, possibly changing its composition and structure. In all circumstances of alloy formation on macroelectrodes, the rate of reduction of Ce3+ was time dependent and sensitive to convection. This significantly complicated analysis of the electrochemical signal, making it very difficult to reliably calculate the concentration of Ce3+, which is required for on-line monitoring. Co-deposition on in-house microfabricated tungsten microelectrodes resulted in steady state currents for both pure aluminium deposition and cerium-aluminium co-deposition (up to the beginning of lithium-aluminium alloying). Thus, unlike on macroelectrodes, the deposition rate occurred at the flux ratio of each species from solution and only one oxidation peak was observed corresponding to the amorphous cerium-aluminium phase, even at high [CeCl3]:[AlCl3] ratios. The steady state alloying current meant that calculating the Ce3+ concentration was relatively simple from co-deposition on microelectrodes. Co-deposition was highly beneficial for studying alloying, however to avoid the addition of Al3+ to the molten salt, in-house microfabricated thin film aluminium microelectrodes were also used to study alloying. Alloying on microfabricated thin film aluminium microelectrodes was hampered by the formation of a native aluminium oxide layer, which prevented cerium insertion into the aluminium. The oxide layer could be disrupted by reduction of lithium, which showed steady state currents (albeit with significant capacitance) could be achieved for alloying by cerium insertion. However, the full surface area of the microelectrode could not be attained and all microelectrodes lost their aluminium layer after multiple lithiation/de-lithiation cycles. These devices need further development to overcome the oxide layer, or prevent its formation, in order to study alloying in greater detail with aluminium microelectrodes to fully realise their advantages for sensing and monitoring in pyroprocessing.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:756997
Date January 2018
CreatorsReeves, Simon John
ContributorsMount, Andrew ; Walton, Anthony
PublisherUniversity of Edinburgh
Source SetsEthos UK
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
Sourcehttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/33046

Page generated in 0.0028 seconds