Cycling provides individual and societal benefits, such as improved health [1], faster intra-urban commuting [2], lower C02 emissions [3] and all in all lower societal costs [4] compared to most other traffic modes. However, the national average of the cycling mode share was only around 10% in 2008 and has not increased remarkably ever since [5]. Several studies indicate that the lack of subjective safety may be a crucial reason to refuse using the bicycle [6, 7].While there is evidence on how to improve subjective safety through infrastructure on road sections [8], there is none concerning intersections or roundabouts yet. To close that gap, we investigate subjective safety at junctions depending on different infrastructure designs. [From: Introduction]
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:82477 |
| Date | 28 December 2022 |
| Creators | Wachholz, Sina, Friel, David, Werner, Theresa, Zimmermann, Liesa, Stark, Rainer |
| Publisher | Technische Universität Dresden |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | doc-type:conferenceObject, info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-813602, qucosa:81360 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds