Humans have extensively altered terrestrial surfaces through land-use and land-cover change. This change has resulted in increased food, fiber, fuel, and wood that is provisioned by ecosystems to support the human population. Unfortunately, the change has also altered climate through carbon emissions and changes in the surface energy balance. Consequently, maximizing both the provisioning and climate regulation services provided by terrestrial ecosystems is a grand challenge facing a growing global population living in a changing climate. The planting of pine forests for timber and carbon storage and switchgrass fields for bioenergy are two land-cover types that can potentially be used for climate mitigation. Importantly, both are highly productive systems representing contrasts in albedo (grass are brighter than pines) and vegetation height (pines are taller than the grass) along with unknown differences in carbon and water balance that influence local to global climate. Here I use eddy-covariance data to investigate how a transition from a perennial bioenergy crop (switchgrass) to a planted pine plantation alters the local surface temperature, global carbon dioxide concentrations, and global energy balance. First, I found that switchgrass and pine ecosystems have very similar local surface temperatures, especially during the grass growing season. After the switchgrass is harvested, surface temperature in the pine forest is much lower than switchgrass because no vegetation is present to facilitate the evaporation of water. The surface temperature in a bare-ground system (a recent clear-cut) was also high relative to the pine and pre-harvest switchgrass ecosystems. This illustrates the importance of maintaining vegetation cover to reduce local surface temperature. Second, I found that the 30-year mean change in global energy balance (i.e., radiative forcing) from planting a pine ecosystem rather than a switchgrass field was positive (pine warms climate) when considering changes in albedo and carbon measured using eddy-covariance systems. When including harvested carbon, pine and switchgrass can have similar global radiative forcing if all harvested pine carbon is stored, but harvested switchgrass carbon is burned. However, no scenarios I explored resulted in a strong negative radiative forcing by the pine ecosystem relative to the switchgrass field. These results show that afforestation or reforestation in the eastern United States may not result in any climate benefit over planting a switchgrass field. However, the presence of vegetation in both ecosystem types offers a clear benefit by cooling local surface temperatures. / Doctor of Philosophy / Humans are changing the Earth's climate by using oil and gas as fuel that emits greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere. Planting trees to reestablish forests is a natural solution for climate change because forests absorb carbon dioxide from the air, but reforestation also changes the Earth's climate in other ways. For example, forests are generally darker than crops and grasses and absorb more sunlight, which traps energy in the atmosphere that can warm global temperature. These non-carbon effects can potentially offset the climate benefit from absorbed carbon dioxide. An alternative natural climate solution is to replace oil and gas with fuels derived from plants, known as bioenergy. Here I compared the local and global climate influence of a tree plantation (loblolly pine) to a bioenergy crop (switchgrass). I found that the local temperature of pine and switchgrass were similar in the summer when the grass was growing, and both were cooler than bare-ground, which was unable to evaporate and transpire water to the atmosphere. Over 30 years, I found that pine and switchgrass absorb similar amounts of carbon. The pine forest absorbs more carbon than switchgrass when it is fully grown but releases carbon during the first five years of growth. As a switchgrass field is brighter than a pine forest, planting a pine forest instead of a switchgrass field warms the Earth's climate. However, assuming no carbon from the harvested trees is released to the atmosphere, the pine and switchgrass have the same influence on global climate. My findings show that a pine plantation and a bioenergy crop can have similar climate benefits when carbon is stored in forests.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/112550 |
| Date | 18 May 2021 |
| Creators | Ahlswede, Benjamin James |
| Contributors | Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Thomas, Robert Quinn, Barrett, John E., O'Halloran, Thomas L., Wynne, Randolph H. |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds