No / This article reports ways in which applicants to the Degree in Social Work see `social
problems¿, their origins and possible solutions to them. What is demonstrated is
that whilst applicants are concerned about a range of problems, those which could
be broadly classified as `anti-social behaviours by individuals or groups¿ predominate,
in contrast to those which could be defined as `aspects of the social structure
which have an adverse impact on individuals or groups¿. Applicants are much more
likely to suggest `individual¿ rather than `social¿ causes and are most likely to suggest
`liberal/reformist¿ solutions. It is argued, in the context of frame analysis, that
pre-existing views will usually impact strongly on how students respond to the
knowledge and challenges offered during training. The article aims to place discussion
within consideration of wider issues, particularly whether social work in Britain
can maintain its historic commitment to social justice and prevent itself becoming
an increasingly uncritical tool of the UK government¿s social authoritarianism.
Finally, it seeks to raise questions about whether social work education can assist
qualifying workers to develop and maintain resiliently radical approaches to practice,
which are also effective in bringing positive change to vulnerable and disadvantaged
people.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/2721 |
| Date | 06 1900 |
| Creators | Gilligan, Philip A. |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Source Sets | Bradford Scholars |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Article, final draft paper |
| Rights | © 2007 Oxford University Press. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds