Return to search

Using functional boxplots to visualize reflectance data and distinguish between areas of native grasses and invasive old world bluestems in a Kansas tall grass prairie

Master of Science / Department of Statistics / Leigh Murray / Using remotely sensed reflectance data is an appealing tool for controlling invasive species of grasses by rangeland managers. Recent developments in functional data analysis include the functional boxplot (FBP) which is shown here to be a useful tool in the visualization of reflectance data. Functional boxplots are a novel method of visually inspecting functional data and determining the presence of outliers in the data. Implementation and interpretation of FBPs are both straightforward and intuitive. The goal of this study is to examine the use of FBPs for visualizing reflectance data, and to determine the efficacy of using the FBP to distinguish between native tall grasses and invasive Old World Bluestem (OWB, Bothriochloa spp.) monocultures in a Kansas prairie. Validation trials were conducted in order to determine the stability of the FBP when used to analyze spectral data. FBPs were shown to be highly stable for use with both native and OWB grasses at all times and subsets of wavelengths tested. Identification trials were conducted by introducing a single OWB observation to a test set of native tall grass observations and constructing a FBP. Results indicate that using observations recorded early in the growing season, the functional boxplot is able to successfully identify the OWB observation as an outlier in a test set of native tall grass observations with an estimated probability 100% and 95.45% when considering the visible and cellular spectrums, respectively. A 95% lower bound for the probability of successfully identifying the OWB observation using the cellular spectrum in May is found to be 89.67%.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:KSU/oai:krex.k-state.edu:2097/13806
Date January 1900
CreatorsHighland, Garth
PublisherKansas State University
Source SetsK-State Research Exchange
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeReport

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds