Raters' response toward victim and perpetrators in the context of rape is examined. More blame is attributed to a female than a male victim by all raters, particularly if the female victim is described only as being raped. Detailed description of different forms of injury resulting from the rape tends to act as a mediating factor in the amount of blame assigned to victims. Whereas the delineation of injury tends to decrease the amount of blame assigned to the female victim, this pattern is reversed for the male. Raters also claim a physically injured rape victim would require a substantially longer recuperation time than one whose injuries are psychological or unspecified.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc504073 |
| Date | 08 1900 |
| Creators | Ee, Juliana Soh-Chiew |
| Contributors | Aronson, Harriet, Burke, Angela J., Schneider, Lawrence J. |
| Publisher | University of North Texas |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | iv, 80 leaves, Text |
| Rights | Public, Ee, Juliana Soh-Chiew, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds