Purpose: Explore the association between movement pattern variables and physical function (PF), compare movement pattern changes between standard and agility/perturbation training and explore the association of movement pattern changes with PF changes after an exercise program.
Methods: Baseline evaluation was performed to collect subject characteristics, self-reported and performance-based PF followed by motion analysis and electromyography tests performed during gait and step down tasks. Subjects randomized into standard or agility/perturbation groups underwent 12 training-sessions. Post-treatment evaluation was performed at 2 months.
Analyses: All analyses were performed for gait and step down task separately. At baseline stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the association of lower extremity kinematics and co-contraction with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index -PF subscale (WOMAC-PF) and the Get up and Go test (GUG) separately. At post-treatment, comparisons of the changes in lower extremity kinematics and changes in co-contraction patterns between subjects who received standard versus agility/perturbation training were performed. Following, stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the association of changes in lower extremity kinematics and changes in co-contraction with changes in WOMAC-PF and changes in GUG.
Results: At baseline results indicated that increased co-contraction during gait and step down were associated with poorer PF. The increased co-contraction of lateral muscle couples during gait was probably an attempt to control knee loading. The increased co-contraction of lateral and medial muscle couples during the step down was likely an attempt to avoid pain and instability as well as control loading at the knee. At post-treatment there was no difference in movement patterns changes between the two exercise groups. Increased co-contraction during gait was associated with improvement in GUG whereas during step down increased co-contraction was associated with worsening in WOMAC-PF. At both time points the observed associations of co-contraction with PF were likely a response to the unique constraints imposed by gait and the step down. We believe in order to improve patterns of movement and thereby improve PF in this population, rehabilitation programs may need to focus on specific practice of tasks which are difficult to people with knee osteoarthritis.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-11242010-153645 |
| Date | 23 December 2010 |
| Creators | Gil, Alexandra B. |
| Contributors | Carol E. Baker, George E. Carvell, Patrick J. Sparto, James J. Irrgang, G. Kelley Fitzgerald |
| Publisher | University of Pittsburgh |
| Source Sets | University of Pittsburgh |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-11242010-153645/ |
| Rights | restricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds