Return to search

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY ASSESMENT (FMA)

The Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) instrument is a self-report outcome tool, designed to measure the effectiveness of Wheeled Mobility and Seating (WMS) interventions for people with disabilities (PWD). To describe the psychometric properties of the FMAs test-retest reliability, a repeated-measures cohort study was conducted. The specific aims of the study included examining the test-retest reliability of the FMA and determining to what extent each self-reported performance item remained stable when clients responded twice to the same questions over a time period of no less than one week and no more than three weeks. Participants were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Centers (UPMC) Center for Assistive Technology (CAT). The study sample involved 20 participants who were non-wheelchair or scooter users but in the process of being evaluated for a device (Non-WMS users) and 21 participants who were being evaluated for a replacement device (Existing WMS users). These 41 participants completed an initial FMA questionnaire. After obtaining the initial assessment, the FMA was administered a second time, within 7-21 days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed to determine agreement between the two scores. Test-retest reliability scores for all items and participants were above the acceptable value of > 0.80 for a clinical assessment tool, except Health Needs and Reach for the Non-WMS users, and Transfers and Carry out daily routine for Existing WMS users. Existing WMS users had higher total scores (greater satisfaction) on the FMA than Non-WMS users. Results indicate that the FMA was a reliable and stable tool for assessing satisfaction of individuals who use or need WMS interventions. Future studies should include larger samples and recruit participants from multiple sites.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-07292010-133735
Date19 August 2010
CreatorsKumar, Amit
ContributorsDiane M. Collins, Rosemarie Cooper, Margo B. Holm, Rory A. Cooper, Mark R. Schmeler
PublisherUniversity of Pittsburgh
Source SetsUniversity of Pittsburgh
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-07292010-133735/
Rightsrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0315 seconds