Return to search

基於不同音樂特徵的音樂檢索方法的效果及效率比較 / Comparing Music Retrieval Methods with Different Music Features

抽取出音樂當中的近似重複樣式來做音樂檢索可以減少要比對的資料量,但是使用者若使用沒有重複的旋律來查詢便會有找不到歌曲的情況。另一方面,將音樂分段成phrase可以減少樹狀索引結構的空間,亦可減少查詢處理時間,但是使用者的查詢若是跨越phrase的,也將影響查詢結果。
在本論文中,我們比較了以近似重複樣式與phrase兩種不同的音樂特徵用來做音樂檢索的效果以及效率。根據實驗顯示,使用者的查詢是重複旋律的機會大於單一phrase,所以用近似重複樣式作為音樂查詢比對資料效果是比phrase好的。而在1-D List索引結構下,近似重複樣式的效率也優於phrase。除此之外,本論文也提出了一個新的近似重複樣式抽取方法,實驗證明我們的方法是有效的。 / Extract the approximate repeating pattern from music data will decrease the volumes of music data that need to be tested when music retrieve. If the user’s query is not a repeating melody, it can’t retrieve the music that the user wants correctly. In addition, segment the music by phrase will decrease the space that tree-like index structure need, and also decrease the retrieval processing time. If the user’s query is not a single phrase, it will influence the effectiveness of retrieval.
In this thesis, we compare the effectiveness and efficiency of music retrieval methods with two different music features (approximate repeating pattern and phrase). According to experiment results, the probability that user’s query is repeating melody is more than the probability that user’s query is a single phrase. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the effectiveness that use approximate repeating pattern to process retrieval is more prominent than the effectiveness that phrase to process retrieval. Furthermore, the efficiency that use approximate repeating pattern to process retrieval is more outstanding than use phrase under 1-D List index structure. Besides, a new approximate repeating pattern extraction method is proposed. Experiment results show that our approximate repeating pattern extraction method can work correctly.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0093753034
Creators梁敬偉, Liang, Jing Wei
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds