Ongoing global change has made understanding the factors that affect adaptation and survival of populations in the context of changing environments a central problem in evolutionary biology. Special focus has been given to the probability of survival through genetic adaptation to lethal environments; a process termed evolutionary rescue. Many studies of this process, both theoretical and empirical, have been carried out over the last two decades. As a result, we now understand how a number of factors may affect the probability of population survival. However, two factors that are known to affect evolutionary responses, mode of reproduction and interspecific interaction, have received limited attention. The main aim of my work was to investigate whether and how mode of reproduction and negative interspecies interactions (competition) affect the probability of evolutionary rescue. To achieve this goal, I set up a series of selection experiments, by propagating populations of unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in various stressful conditions, and monitored their survival and fitness. To investigate the effect of sex in these experiments, I manipulated mode of reproduction, by constructing the experimental populations allowed to reproduce either only sexually or asexually or both. To investigate the effect of competition, I manipulated the presence of the competitor(s) in the experimental populations, by cultivating them either in presence or absence of the competitor. I first tested the effect of rate of environmental deterioration and mode of reproduction on extinction dynamics and evolutionary rescue of the experimental populations. I found positive correlation between the rate of extinctions and the rate of environmental deterioration. The experiment revealed an interaction between mode of reproduction and the rate of deterioration, manifested through significantly reduced extinction rate of sexual populations relative to asexual populations in environment deteriorating at intermediate rate. I then investigated the effect of sex and competition on the probability of evolutionary rescue, by propagating the experimental populations in environment deteriorating in a simple way (the change comprising a single abiotic factor) and complex way (the change of both abiotic and biotic factors). I found the negative effect of competition on the probability of evolutionary rescue, and beneficial effect of sex in both types of environmental deterioration, reflected in higher number of rescued populations relative to asexual group. I then tested whether phylogenetic relatedness between a competitor and the focal species and the extent of their ecological similarity affect the likelihood of evolutionary rescue, by subjecting the experimental populations to the presence of 10 different competitors, isolated from two different types of habitats, and each being positioned on a different branch of the phylogenetic tree of Chlamydomonas genus. The probability of evolutionary rescue was contingent on the identity of a competitor species, but the results showed no significant effects of phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity. Finally, I investigated which experimental factors could potentially select for the long-term maintenance of sex, by subjecting the experimental populations to different types of selective environments (directional and fluctuating change of abiotic factors, the presence of the competitor) and monitoring the frequency of sex over the course of time. No selective environment significantly increased the rate of sex in the experimental populations. In contrast, I found reduction in frequency of sex in the populations subjected to fluctuating environmental change. My results demonstrate that both mode of reproduction and competition affect the probability of evolutionary rescue, which is generally positively affected by sex and negatively affected by competition. However, these general effects may be altered by other factors, namely mode of environmental change and the identity of the competitor species.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:756668 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | Petkovic, Nikola |
| Contributors | Colegrave, Nick ; Little, Thomas |
| Publisher | University of Edinburgh |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Source | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31387 |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds